Review: The fastest 1TB hard drive yet
Samsung squeezed 334GB onto each of the F1's three platters
Computerworld - What takes 37 hours to format but sips power and moves faster than spit on a hot griddle? The answer is Samsung's 1TB Spinpoint F1 Series hard drive.
Rather than go with the flow and use four or more platters to contain its 1TB as most drive manufacturers would do, Samsung took a long cut and squeezed 334GB onto each of the F1's three platters. The obvious benefit is that there's slightly less of everything: power consumption, noise, vibration and the like. With fewer parts, the statistical failure rate drops accordingly, and Samsung has added staggered spin-up technology, device-controlled power management and noise suppression of its own devising. It's a nice package and it is a quiet drive.
The not so obvious problem is that the higher the areal density (the amount of data bits crammed into the given dimensions of a platter), the more the theoretical possibility exists that there could be a read or write error. After all, more data is traveling under the R/W head as the platter rotates at 7,200 rpm. (Samsung employs a very interesting footnote on its specification sheet for the drive's actual rotation speed: "7,200 rpm class. Actual speed can be slightly different.") Some safeguards need to be taken at the firmware level to prevent that from happening and, done right, you'll never notice.
Samsung initially believed that my drive might have been defective, so it sent a second unit, which also spent 37 hours having its bits blanked. A reformat of 1TB Hitachi, Western Digital, and Seagate drives showed that they all needed just three and a half hours. An attempt at reformatting the Spinpoint F1 still required 37 hours, but switching to a Windows XP MCE system saw the usual three and a half hours of formatting time emerge.
That left an interaction between Vista Ultimate and the drive as the probable culprit -- and it only seemed to affect Samsung, not any of the other three drives I've reviewed in the past. Checking through the history, an automatic Vista update had occurred just prior to testing the F1. A quick reversal to a restore point before the update resulted in a more usual three-and-a-half-hour format time. (The particular update contained one of the prerequisites for SP1, among other things, and Samsung has been alerted.)
Despite the effect on the formatting speed of the drive, the data handling speed remained the same pre- and postpatch. In fact, the Spinpoint F1 ran through HD Tach with the fastest results of the four 1TB drives tested so far: 205.8Mbyte/sec. burst speed and 95.9Mbyte/sec. average read. Why? That's the upside to having more data moving under the read/write head in the same period of time relative to a drive with a lower areal density.
On the power front, the F1 uses just a half-watt more during average operations than Western Digital's RE2GP "Green" drive -- although it does gobble up 3.7 additional watts at idle than the RE2GP.
What it all boils down to is that if you're running a desktop system with occasional drive access and you're worried about the planet, go Western Digital. However, if you have a server (or even a desktop system) that sees a lot drive access, a 7% higher power draw is easily acceptable in exchange for 11% to 12% faster access.
- Price range: $280 - $400
Benchmark comparison with other drives tested
|Drive||Burst Speed (MB/sec.)||Random Access||Average Read (MB/sec.)||CPU Utilization|
|Samsung's Spinpoint F1 HD103UJ 1TB Internal||205.8MB/sec.||14.0ms||95.9MB/sec.||7%|
|Western Digital WD10-00FYPS-01KKB 02.0 1TB Internal||184.0MB/sec.||15.1ms||65.3MB/sec.||4%|
|Seagate ST31000340OAS SD03 1TB Internal||124.7MB/sec.||13.0ms||85.4MB/sec.||10%|
|Hitachi HDS721010KLA GKA0 1TB Internal||185.9MB/sec.||12.6ms||72.4MB/sec.||4%|
|Seagate ST3250824AS 3.AA 250GB Internal||120.7MB/sec.||16.9ms||56.6MB/sec.||2%|
|Western Digital WD 5000AA External 200i 500GB USB||25.0MB/sec.||13.4ms||24.8MB/sec.||1%|
Power consumption comparison
|Samsung||7.9 watts||7.7 watts|
|WDC||7.4 watts||4.0 watts|
|Seagate||11 watts||8 watts|
|Hitachi||10.8 watts||9 watts|
Read more about Storage Hardware in Computerworld's Storage Hardware Topic Center.
- Top Five Reasons Why Customers Deploy a Flash 1st Strategy on EMC VNX Storage Read why with a FLASH 1st strategy, customers don't need to compromise between performance and TCO.
- Analyst: EMC's FLASH 1st Strategy Gain insight from analyst ESG on Flash storage and how the logic and value behind EMC's strategy for Flash.
- IBM FlashSystem At-a-Glance The IBM FlashSystem V840 Enterprise Performance Solution accelerates applications with enterprise-class advanced storage capabilities for less than the cost of disk.
- Top Reasons for Upgrading to Emulex Gen 5 Fibre Channel HBAs With Gen 5 Fibre Channel HBAs you can run more virtual machines and applications per server, cut your HBA installation and management time...
- Business-driven data protection Setting up data protection infrastructures with your organizations' core mission or business in mind is key. In this webinar, the ARCserve team will...
- On-Demand Webinar: Mind the Gap! Watch the webinar featuring Bob Janssen, CTO and Co-Founder of RES Software, to start building a solid foundation for business and IT to... All Storage Hardware White Papers | Webcasts