Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Apple tries to stem Time Machine complaints

It blames drive-partitioning mistakes and computer-naming errors; users keep posting problems

November 6, 2007 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - Apple Inc. has addressed some of the problems Leopard users have reported with Time Machine, including stalled and invisible backups, with several support documents.

Macintosh users, however, are still packing Apple's support forums with complaints about the backup and restore software.

Initial Time Machine backups have been problematic since Leopard launched Oct. 26, with scores of users reporting that the software would stall after as little as 10GB or as much as 90% of the entire data set had been copied to the external drive. Most said they had received the error message: "Unable to complete backup. An error occurred while copying files to the backup volume."

According to Apple, the fault is in the external drive's partitioning.

"Some hard disks ship with a Master Boot Record (MBR) partition type," Apple said in a support document posted yesterday. "You will need to erase the external disk so that it is supported by Time Machine."

Macs running on PowerPC processors should reformat the drive with Disk Utility and repartition it using the Apple Partition Map scheme. Intel-based Macs, on the other hand, should select the GUID partition scheme. "Once the external hard disk is reformatted, select it again in Time Machine preferences, and use it for your backups," Apple added.

Another Apple document spelled out a bug that prevents users from seeing backups, even though Time Machine has successfully copied data. The culprit: nonalphanumeric characters in the computer's name.

"Past backups may not appear if your computer name includes certain characters," said the note, dated yesterday. The only acceptable characters are the English alphabet, lower- and uppercase, and the numbers 0-9. The computer's name is set in the Sharing Preferences panel.

Users posting to the Time Machine support discussion, however, claimed that the backup software's problems went beyond the two problems Apple addressed. According to the forum's threads, problems include Time Machine corrupting drives, the program faltering before it finishes restoring a backup and the deletion of files from backups before the external drive has been filled.

Some were clearly at their wit's end.

"Time Machine does NOT work," said a user identified as Applemans. "Changing hard disk names: with or without spaces, characters etc., erasing hard disks, reinstall Leopard. It simply doesn't matter what you do, how you do it."

Theories abounded on the forum as to causes for the various Time Machine snafus. Many users took LaCie Ltd. to task because they were using hard drives from that maker, a popular supplier of external disks to the Mac market. Someone purportedly from LaCie waded in on one thread: "LaCie has shipped a few million drives to Mac users over the years," said someone tagged as LaCie FireWire. "Many more than other vendors. It makes sense then that there will be a high proportion of LaCie drives in use by Mac users."

Read more about storage in Computerworld's Storage Knowledge Center.



Jump to comments

Mac

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

What People Are Saying

White Papers & Webcasts

High Performance for Integrating Massive Data Volumes
Processing very large data sets provides unique constraints, especially when time windows available for this processing are shrinking. This Technical White Paper presents...  

Gartner Podcast: Driving SharePoint Adoption in Lotus Notes Shops
Learn how can you drive mainstream user adoption of Microsoft SharePoint when your users are committed to using email.

IDC Webcast: Linux Adoption in a Global Recession
Access this webcast, compliments of Novell and HP, for a limited time only!

Whitepaper: Drive SharePoint Adoption in Lotus Notes Shops
Learn how you can drive your users to Microsoft SharePoint when they rely on IBM Lotus Notes.  


IT Jobs