Computerworld - Do you know how much your home office costs? I'm not talking about the price you paid for the equipment (you probably do know that amount). Rather, I mean how much of a financial and environmental burden it is to you and your community on an ongoing basis.
I recently found out, for example, that the computing equipment in my home office last year consumed 803 kilowatt-hours of power and directly resulted in the emission of 889 lbs. of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. (See "The numbers behind the numbers" for the formulas used in this article.) My personal contribution to global warming also included 1.4 lbs. of sulfur dioxide and about half a pound of nitrogen oxide, all byproducts of the power-generation process serving my office, according to the Independent System Operator of New England.
All that energy came with a financial cost as well, of course. Could I save money and help save the planet by reducing my energy use without compromising my business? To answer that question, I set out to eliminate every wasted watt of energy -- and wasted dollar -- I could find in my office setup.
The result was shocking. Based on an audit of my own office's energy use, I estimated that when I started, my equipment added $112 to my annual electricity bill, or 8.5% of the total for my household. Had I been more careful in the selection, configuration and use of the equipment, I could have saved as much as 80% of that -- and put $90 back into my pocket.
If that sounds like small change in the grand scheme of things, multiply it by the 36 million home offices in the U.S. that use computer and communications equipment, according to market research company IDC. If all offices in the U.S., both commercial and home, used Energy Star-certified equipment, individuals and businesses would save $1.8 billion in energy costs, and the resulting reduction in greenhouse emissions would be equivalent to removing 2.7 million cars from the roads, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
My biggest savings came from some simple changes. I replaced or eliminated inefficient equipment and changed how I configured and used it. After a few big wins, however, the law of diminishing returns began to take hold. The hardest part was deciding what trade-offs I was willing to make to save ever smaller increments of power.
But I'm getting ahead of myself. I couldn't do anything to make my office more energy efficient without knowing where I already stood. "Measure to find out, experiment to optimize, and keep measuring," advises Amory Lovins, chairman and chief scientist at the energy efficiency think tank Rocky Mountain Institute. I decided to follow that advice by performing an energy audit.
Fortunately, an energy audit is something you can do yourself with the help of an inexpensive metering device such as P3 International Corp.'s Kill A Watt meter. That device has a retail price of $39.99, but I found one for less than $20 on Amazon.com. Even better, to my surprise, I was able to borrow one from my local library. The Kill A Watt plugs into a power outlet and has its own outlet on the front for attaching the device you want to monitor. Among other things, the device displays power draw in watts and tracks cumulative power consumption over time in kilowatt-hours.
By placing all of my devices on two daisy-chained power strips and plugging one of them into the Kill A Watt, I was able to track power consumption for my equipment as a whole. "Your IT equipment should use an average of just 0.2 watts per square foot if you spec and operate it optimally," says Lovins. Mine wasn't even close.
This wasn't really a surprise: "energy-efficient" is not a term I would have expected to apply to my home office. The 120-square-foot space contained a mish-mash of about a dozen devices spread across twelve feet of desk space:
With the exception of one laptop, none of it was Energy Star-certified.
My workday typically includes talking on the phone, taking notes, checking e-mail, doing research online, printing out 20 to 30 pages of notes and research and writing up stories in Microsoft Word. At the end of the workday, I simply turned out the lights and walked out of the office. The monitor turned off after 15 minutes of inactivity, and I blithely assumed that everything else went into low-power mode. It didn't.
  The Kill A Watt is the key to an energy audit.  |
With the Kill A Watt's help, I discovered that my typical daytime load ranged from 55 watts at idle to more than 160 watts, or about 1.3 watts per square foot, when I was sitting at my desk and typing at the keyboard. Had I been using a desktop instead of a laptop, that number would have been at least 50 watts higher.
Because the wattage measurements varied so widely, I decided to look at total power consumption over a 24-hour period. It turned out that my office sucked away 2.2 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of power during that time. Since all of that power is converted to heat, I was also warming up my office to the tune of 562 British Thermal Units (BTUs) per hour. That's roughly one-sixth of the heat output from a 1,000-watt hair dryer, heat that my fan had to work to remove.
(For those who find these measurements confusing: Watts measure the load, or energy demand, of a device; think of it like the weight of an object you're trying to hold in your outstretched arm. Kilowatt-hours measure how much energy the device actually uses over time, similar to the amount of work you'd have to do to hold up that heavy object for a while. And a BTU is the energy it takes to increase the temperature of 1 pound of water by 1 degree F.)
Free Insider Guide
How does your salary compare with your peers? Find out using our Smart Salary Tool.
Copyright © 1994 - 2012 Computerworld Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Computerworld Inc. is prohibited. Computerworld and Computerworld.com and the respective logos are trademarks of International Data Group Inc.
