Should you maintain three data centers for disaster recovery?
In this new architecture, two nearby data centers are linked synchronously with a third, located farther away, linked asynchronously
Computerworld - Pushed in part by U.S. business regulations concerning data preservation, financial and other high-end organizations are moving to a three data center architecture for disaster recovery, says Wikibon.org community member and data center consultant Josh Krischer.
In this architecture, two nearby data centers are linked synchronously with a third, located farther away, linked asynchronously. However, he warned, some data is always lost in a disaster, even when the remote copy is done via a synchronous link. Keeping data losses to a minimum is critical for some applications, but a more important issue is assuring data consistency and integrity at the recovery site. Inconsistent data at the recovery site usually requires time-consuming recovery processes, which may take days.
Speaking at Wikibon.org's weekly Peer Incite teleconference, which is open to all interested parties, Wikibon.org co-founder David Floyer related his experience consulting with one such company that was considering implementing very high-speed continuous asynchronous data transfer from its U.S. to its European data centers to guard against a potential major loss. "The company had two data centers, 15 miles apart, synchronously connected so transactional data is written to both simultaneously," he says. "If one goes down, it can recover from the other, theoretically with very little loss of data."
The proximity of the two centers, determined in part by the distance over which a synchronous link can be maintained, also avoided one of the common errors in disaster recovery planning, putting the recovery site too far from the main data center. "Putting them far apart may make you feel safer," says Floyer, "but it actually makes recovery harder and more expensive and may therefore decreases the plan's effectiveness."
However, he says, this company was concerned about the possibility of a regionwide disaster that might bring down both data centers. The organization was sending a 2TB incremental backup to its European data center twice daily, but in a regional disaster that could result in the loss of up to 20 hours of transactions. It wanted to invest in an advanced network-based system to create an asynchronous link between the U.S. and European data centers to reduce the maximum potential loss to a few minutes. The implementation and operational costs for this upgrade was estimated at about $25 million over three years.
The business leads
This might seem to be an extravagant solution to the problem, and Floyer emphasizes that this isn't the answer for everyone. "I worked with a retailer, for instance, who decided that local backup site was sufficient for their DR needs. If a regional disaster took out both data centers and distribution centers, they expected their business would not survive in any case."
- 15 Non-Certified IT Skills Growing in Demand
- How 19 Tech Titans Target Healthcare
- Twitter Suffering From Growing Pains (and Facebook Comparisons)
- Agile Comes to Data Integration
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
- What Datapipe customers need to know about the new PCI DSS 3.0 compliance standard This handy quick reference outlines what PCI DSS 3.0 is, who needs to be compliant and how Alert Logic solutions address the new...
- Defense Throughout the Vulnerability Life Cycle This whitepaper provides insight into how to leverage threat and log management technologies to protect your IT assets throughout their vulnerability life cycle.
- The Critical Role of Support in Your Enterprise Mobility Management Strategy Most business leaders underestimate the importance of tech support when they choose an EMM solution. Here's what to put on your checklist.
- Separating Work and Personal at the Platform Level: How BlackBerry Balance Works BlackBerry® Balance™ separates work from personal on the same mobile device, right at a platform level. Find out how it can work for...
- Live Webcast Best Practices for the Hyperconverged Enterprise Network To the Age of Constant Connectivity and Information overload
- Getting Ready for BlackBerry Enterprise Service 10.2 Find out how BlackBerry® Enterprise Service 10 helps organizations address the full spectrum of EMM challenges, while balancing the needs of both the...
- Containerization Options: How to Choose the Best DLP Solution for Your Organization This webcast outlines a framework for making the right choice when it comes to containerization approaches, along with the pros and cons of... All Networking White Papers | Webcasts