Skip the navigation

Amidst public criticism, Massachusetts finalizes open documents format compromise

Revised plan embraces both ODF and Office Open XML

By Eric Lai
August 2, 2007 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - The Massachusetts IT Division (ITD) officially confirmed Wednesday that it is moving forward with a revised state technology master plan that embraces both OpenDocument Format (ODF) and Microsoft Corp.'s Office Open XML as viable ways to store public documents.

The ITD also released public comments received during a three-week comment period last month after it said it would add Microsoft's Open XML to its list of acceptable document formats.

Those letters take up 852 pages in a 16MB PDF document (PDF format).

Explaining the reversal

In a letter posted at the ITD's Web site and co-signed by Henry Dormitzer, undersecretary of administration and finance and Bethann Pepoli, acting Massachusetts CIO, the commonwealth acknowledged that most of the 460 comments it received about its Enterprise Technical Reference Model v4.0 dealt with that decision.

"We believe that these concerns, as with those regarding ODF, are appropriately handled through the standards setting process, and we expect both standards to evolve and improve," said the letter. "Moreover, we believe that the impact of any legitimate concerns raised about either standard is outweighed substantially by the benefits of moving toward open, XML-based document format standards."

Wednesday's confirmation caps a near-total reversal of the controversial plan first announced in September 2005 when then-CIO Peter Quinn announced his intention to ban the use of Microsoft Office by state employees in favor of productivity software supporting open document formats that he said were more suitable for long-term document archives and more accessible to the general public.

As early as a year ago, the state was already being forced to back down by advocates for people with disabilities, who argued that ODF did not support assistive technologies, such as screen readers, as well as Microsoft Office formats. Opponents of big government also argued that a forced move off Office would be costly and risky.

In a statement, Tom Robertson, general manager of interoperability and standards at Microsoft, said Wednesday's announcement allows government employees "the freedom to choose whichever format best serves their needs. The commonwealth's decision also reflects the fact that formats will evolve over time and that approved standards lists should also evolve."

Winners, losers, bloggers, and the Big Dig

Andy Updegrove, a lawyer and open-standards advocate, wrote in his Standards Blog that the outcome is a "regrettable" abandonment of a "principled stance."

Most of the comments received by the ITD between July 5 and July 20, after the ITD had already publicly announced its plans to make Open XML an acceptable open format for state use, also appear to criticize the ITD's decision.

"Keeping all public records in an open format is the most responsible action any government agency can take," wrote Don Casteel.

Our Commenting Policies
Blog Spotlight

This pilot fish is a contractor at a military base, working on some very cool fire-control systems for tanks. But when he spots something obviously wrong during a live-fire test, he can't get the firing-range commander's attention.