Skip the navigation

U.S. military needs wikis, video sharing, defense expert says

U.S. forces need better ways to communicate with other groups, Guy Ben-Ari says

By Grant Gross
January 24, 2007 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service - The U.S. military should embrace user-driven Web services such as wikis, video-sharing sites and social networking sites as its focus grows to include providing more security and reconstruction help, a defense analyst recommended today.

The military is increasingly moving toward a role where it will share responsibilities with organizations outside the U.S. government, including charitable organizations, international aid groups and even private businesses, said Guy Ben-Ari, a fellow in the Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank.

At times when the military is helping with reconstruction or security following a natural or human-made disaster, U.S. forces need to find better ways to communicate with other groups, said Ben-Ari, speaking at the Network Centric Warfare conference in Washington. Too often, the U.S. military has been reluctant to share even unclassified information with other groups working toward the same goals, he said.

Members of the military have good information to share on terrain or possible danger spots, but if they debate too long about what they can share with other organizations, the information becomes useless, he said.

"Rethink what you're sharing, what you're willing to share," he said to the crowd, about half of whom were uniformed military. "Information sharing not only makes sense, but is critical."

Before Ben-Ari spoke, David Emery, chief engineer for the U.S. Army's Future Combat Systems project, said instant messaging and whiteboard sharing were the "killer apps" the Army needed in the field. But Ben-Ari said those two applications were the "tip of the iceberg," and the military could offer many more information-sharing tools using readily available technology.

For example, a group of military officers launched in the early days of the current Iraq war. At the site, they shared tips and warnings about locations in Iraq, and the site rapidly grew to have thousands of members, Ben-Ari said. The U.S. military threatened to shut the site down because it was on the open Internet, but it eventually moved the site in-house and restricted access via passwords.

After a major earthquake in Pakistan in October 2005, a small group of aid workers launched, allowing aid workers there to share information and pictures, Ben-Ari added. Within weeks, became the go-to site for aid workers headed to Pakistan, and the site still operates today with support from Pakistani and U.S. groups, he noted.

Ben-Ari acknowledged that there's a potential for user-generated Web sites to include inaccurate or malicious information. But in most cases, user-generated sites self-police -- if a terrorist had posted information on, the military officers there would have quickly recognized the imposter, he said.

"The power today is with the end users, and it's the end users who drive the content," he said. "The argument is [that in disaster zones], some information is better than none." 

Reprinted with permission from Story copyright 2014 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Our Commenting Policies
Blog Spotlight

Staff member at a senior center calls this pilot fish, complaining that her printer won't work. And since she's the kind of user who thinks computers just get in the way of getting her job done, fish has his work cut out for him.