Computing in the cloud
Who needs hardware? Amazon offers companies all the computing power they want in its virtual Elastic Compute Cloud
December 21, 2006 12:00 PM ETAmazon.com Inc. is making a big bet, but it's not on selling books, CDs or holiday gifts. Instead, it wants to sell you all the processing power you can eat. Rather than competing with your local bookstore, it's taking on the likes of IBM, Hewlett-Packard Co. and Sun Microsystems Inc.
Amazon's recently released Elastic Compute Cloud (which it calls EC2 and is still in beta) for the first time brings grid computing and utility computing to the masses -- the ability to buy server power in the same way you now buy electricity or water.
In essence, you pay 10 cents per virtual server per hour, plus bandwidth costs, and you can do whatever you want with that power. While it's not quite as simple as turning on your water tap, it's the same basic idea. You pay only for the processing power you use, and how much you use is entirely in your control.
IBM, HP and Sun already sell computing power on demand, but they sell primarily to large corporations, and on a very big scale. Amazon, on the other hand, sells to small and medium-size businesses, as well as to large corporations, and does it via unique technology that builds on previously released Amazon middleware services.
Not everyone agrees that the same company that offers 40% off best-sellers should try to become a big-time IT provider. But Amazon has always believed that books were only an entree into selling far more sophisticated goods and services. Can it succeed? We'll take a look inside the technology, then talk to the Amazon executives in charge of the service, which may give some hint as to whether it will pay off.
How it works
Let's start off with a look at what the system is, how it works and a brief history of it. EC2 is not, in fact, the first of this type of service that Amazon has launched; it's an outgrowth of an existing platform called Amazon Web Services. Back in March 2006, Amazon released its Simple Storage Service (S3), online metered storage that costs 15 cents per gigabyte per month of storage used, plus 20 cents per gigabyte of data transferred. It uses standard Representational State Transfer and Simple Object Access Protocol interfaces.
In July 2006, Amazon followed with the Simple Queuing Service (SQS), a scalable hosted queue that stores messages as they travel between computers. It's designed to let developers easily move data between distributed application components, while ensuring that messages aren't lost.
It can be used to transfer messages even when individual components aren't currently available -- once a component is available, it's sent to it from the queue. Again, it's a metered model; costs are 10 cents per 1,000 messages sent, and 20 cents per gigabyte of data transferred. Like S3, it uses REST and SOAP interfaces.
amazon
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Death to PST Files
Download Now
Business Process Framework Demo
Learn about Configurable Business Processes and Calculated Fields. Watch Now!
A Green Architectural Strategy That Puts IT in the Black
Levergage green computing across your data center. Read more now.
Manager Experience Demo
Go beyond self-service solutions to perform more effectively. Watch Now.
Quantifying the Business Value of VMware View
Learn why you should invest in a centralized virtual desktop.
WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: More than Network Cost Savings
View this Webcast Now!
Forrester Consulting Mobility Study: Taking Control of Enterprise Mobile Device Diversity
Download Now
Asia-Pacific Enterprise Network Solutions
Learn through this Webcast how your business can achieve reliability, performance and value in hard-to-reach locations within the Asia-Pacific region.
What IT Must Do to Support Employee-Owned BlackBerry, iPhone and Android Mobile Devices
Download Now
Mainsoft Webcast w/ Forrester Research: Drive SharePoint Adoption in Lotus Notes Shops
How can you drive mainstream user adoption of Microsoft SharePoint when your users rely on Lotus Notes?

