Princeton report slams Diebold touch-screen systems
Researchers created vote-stealing code; Diebold disputes claim
Computerworld - A recently released report by researchers at Princeton University alleges more security flaws in Diebold Election Systems Inc.'s touch-screen voting systems.
The school's Center for Information Technology Policy, which studies computer technology's effect on society, posted the report online yesterday. Computer science researchers at the university said they were able to create vote-stealing code that can be installed in a minute on Diebold hardware and change vote counts undetected, according to a statement from Princeton.
The devices are also susceptible to computer viruses "that can spread themselves automatically and invisibly from machine to machine during normal pre- and postelection activity," he claimed.
For its part, Diebold hotly disputed the report. According to David Byrd, president of Diebold Election Systems, the TS machine used by the Princeton researchers had security software that was two generations old and is no longer even in use.
"Normal security procedures were ignored," he said in a statement yesterday. "Numbered security tape, 18 enclosure screws and numbered security tags were destroyed or missing so that the researchers could get inside the unit. A virus was introduced to a machine that is never attached to a network."
Byrd said the TS has advanced security features, including Advanced Encryption Standard 128-bit data encryption, digitally signed memory card data, Secure Sockets Layer data encryption for transmitted results and dynamic passwords.
He added that "by any standard -- academic or common sense -- the study is unrealistic and inaccurate."
The study was made public at the same time Maryland elections officials are struggling to count votes in the wake of problems related to touch-screen systems in the state's Tuesday primary. Those problems arose when voter access cards needed for the machines were not distributed to polling places, casuing delays in voting.
Related Blog Entries:
- Martin McKeay: Diebold says "They're poor researchers"
- Martin McKeay: Diebold machines found to have vulnerabilities. Again.
- Sharon Machlis: Hacking electronic voting machines
- Robert L. Mitchell: The voting machine that couldn't count straight
Read more about Security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.
- Enable secure remote access to 3D data without sacrificing visual perfomance Design and manufacturing companies must adapt quickly to the demands of an increasingly global and competitive economy. To speed time to market for...
- Virtually Delivered High Performance 3D Graphics "A picture is worth a thousand words." That old phrase is as true today as it ever was. Pictures (i.e., those with heavy...
- Best Practices for Securing Hadoop Historically, Apache Hadoop has provided limited security capabilities. To protect sensitive data being stored and analyzed in Hadoop, security architects should use a...
- Top Tips for Securing Big Data Environments: Why Big Data Doesn't Have to Mean Big Security Challenges Organizations must come to terms with the security challenges they introduce. As big data environments ingest more data, organizations will face significant risks...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Responding to New SSL Cybersecurity Threat The featured Gartner research examines current strategies to address new SSL cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities. All Security White Papers | Webcasts
Our new bimonthly Internet of Things newsletter helps you keep pace with the rapidly evolving technologies, trends and developments related to the IoT. Subscribe now and stay up to date!