Paper Trail Flawed in Ohio Election, Study Finds
E-voting has benefits, but still a calculated risk, report says
Computerworld - A report questioning the accuracy of Diebold Election Systems' e-voting equipment in a recent Ohio election gives more ammunition to critics who doubt the viability of electronic voting technology.
The report, issued publicly last week, was based on a study funded by the Board of Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio. It claimed that even backup paper records meant to assure voters that their votes were tabulated correctly can prove inaccurate.
Nearly 10% of the paper copies of votes cast in the election were "either destroyed, blank, illegible, missing, taped together or otherwise compromised," the report said. Ohio law requires that each machine include a so-called voter-verified paper audit trail listing each vote -- and considers that the official ballot.
"There are some serious process issues that need to be addressed," said Steven Hertzberg, project director at the Election Science Institute, which conducted the study of a May 2 primary election in Cuyahoga County.
ESI is a San Francisco-based nonprofit organization founded in 2002 to promote the development of auditable election systems and help ensure that all votes cast are counted accurately.
"What we found is that when you take this [technology] out of the lab and put it in a real work environment with real voters, you're going to have some issues you need to resolve," Hertzberg said.
The May 2 election marked the first use of Diebold's Accu¿Vote TSx touch-screen systems in the county, which includes Cleveland and surrounding communities.
In a letter to the county commissioners, Hertzberg said the study found that voters did benefit from the e-voting systems, noting that the Diebold machines are easier to use than the punch-ballot systems they replaced. However, use of the TSx equipment should currently be viewed as a calculated risk for the county, he warned.
For example, the report said that 72% of the polling places demonstrated a discrepancy between the electronic record on memory cards and the paper ballots; 42% of the discrepancies involved problems with 25 votes or more.
ESI also told county officials that some of the voting equipment, including 87 paper rolls and 28 voting machines, was found to be missing prior to the start of the study. Therefore, the institute's report concluded that it is "unable to give a definitive opinion of the accuracy of the Diebold TSx system."
The report also suggested that printer malfunctions could cause "profound" election problems. Such problems could be caused by paper jams or rolls improperly loaded on to the machines. The report urged extensive training of personnel, printer testing and the creation of contingency plans in case of printer malfunction.
The spokesman also contended that ESI failed to take into account special procedures used for some voters, such as 17-year-olds allowed to vote on selected ballot questions who used separate memory cards.
In addition, the Diebold spokesman charged that ESI and the county commissioners released the report publicly despite hearing of the possible flawed methods earlier from Diebold officials.
In an August 16 letter sent to the county commissioners, Michael Lindroos, Diebold's vice president and counsel, said that the Allen, Texas-based company was "surprised and dismayed" by the publication of the report and noted that ESI did not let the vendor participate in the analysis of the election. "Diebold Election Systems equipment is reliable and accurate," Lindroos said.
The county expected some problems to be found in the study, considering that the election marked the first use of the TSx machines there, said Hugh Shannon, government service coordination manager for the county.
Shannon said the commission, ESI, Diebold and the election board "have agreed to meet and work through the issues of the report and have some more definitive answers by the end of the month to plan for [the] November [election]."
A spokesman for Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell said the Diebold machines have been tested and certified by both the state and federal governments.
"The problems in the primary in Cuyahoga County were problems with the procedures and poll worker training," Blackwell said.
This report underscores that voting machines aren't used in a vacuum, noted Michael Shamos, a professor who specializes in e-voting and security issues at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. The devices are used as part of a huge system of people, laws and procedures, he said.
Shamos noted that the paper trails didn't guarantee a safe, reliable election. "When machines fail," he said, "the paper trail doesn't work, either."
Read more about Government IT in Computerworld's Government IT Topic Center.
- Best iPhone, iPad Business Apps for 2014
- 14 Tech Conventions You Should Attend in 2014
- 10 Desktop Apps to Power Your Windows PC
- How to Add New Job Skills Without Going Back to School
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
If you use ‘password,’ one the worst passwords, as your password, fail to keep antivirus protection updated and don’t bother to deploy security patches to close critical vulnerabilities, then maybe you should consider working for the cybersecurity-clueless federal government; you’d fit right in, according to Senator Tom Coburn's cybersecurity and critical infrastructure report.
- IT Certification Study Tips
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Study Tip guide and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, cheat sheets, product reviews and more.
- Changing the Way Government Works: Four Technology Trends that Drive Down Costs and Increase Productivity
- This paper discusses four technology-based approaches to improving processes and increasing
productivity while driving down department and agency costs.
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux - The Original Cloud Operating System
- Linux adoption is growing against a number of measures, such as the
number of supercomputers that run Linux and the size of the contributing...
- OpenStack Hype vs. Reality: CIO Quick Pulse
- Open-source architecture can enable IT departments to build infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) clouds running on standard hardware.
- Building a Bridge to the Next Generation Data Center
- Selecting a widely adopted operating system is a foundational component of a standardization strategy.
- OpenStack and Red Hat: IDC White paper
- Most OpenStack deployments are by public cloud providers that are early adopters of technology and use OpenStack in a do-it-yourself deployment and support... All Government IT White Papers
- Webinar: Building a Big Data solution that's production-ready Big data solutions are no longer just a nice-to-have.
- Meg Whitman presents Unlocking IT with Big Data During this Web Event you will hear Meg Whitman, President and CEO, HP discuss HAVEn - the #1 Big Data platform, as well...
- The New Way to Work Knowledge Vault This Knowledge Vault focuses on how, in today's increasingly virtual world, it's more important than ever to engage deeply with employees, suppliers, partners,...
- Getting Ready for BlackBerry Enterprise Service 10.2 Find out how BlackBerry® Enterprise Service 10 helps organizations address the full spectrum of EMM challenges, while balancing the needs of both the...
- Containerization Options: How to Choose the Best DLP Solution for Your Organization This webcast outlines a framework for making the right choice when it comes to containerization approaches, along with the pros and cons of...
- All Government IT Webcasts