House panel: VA ignores cybersecurity warnings

The agency last month acknowledged losing personal data on millions of U.S. military personnel

By Grant Gross

June 14, 2006 12:00 PM ET

Recommended

IDG News Service -

U.S. lawmakers today questioned why the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) continues to suffer from cybersecurity problems despite multiple warnings from government auditors.

Members of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee asked government auditors why the VA has not acted on repeated cybersecurity recommendations. The hearing follows the VA's announcement last month that the personal data of 26.5 million U.S. military veterans and spouses was stolen from the home of a VA data analyst, who had the information stored on a personal laptop computer and an external hard drive. He was not authorized to take that information home.

The VA has said that the computer equipment -- not the data -- was the target of whoever stole it.

Some veterans received notices of the data theft by mail this week, nearly six weeks after the May 3 break-in. Rep. Bob Filner (D-Calif.) called the VA's response to the data theft "pathetic."

"If it were possible to approach the theft of veterans' and service members' records without emotions ... this situation might be even an interesting case study of lax policies, failed leadership and organizational arrogance," Filner said.

VA Secretary R. James Nicholson announced last month he had demoted two agency supervisors who failed to immediately tell him of the data theft. The analyst who took home the data against agency policy will also be fired, Nicholson said. As recently as last week, the VA has said there's no indication the stolen information has been used in identity theft schemes.

The committee will hear from Nicholson later this month.

Auditors with the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the VA's own inspector general's office said at today's hearing that they have no authority to force the VA to comply with their recommendations. In addition, the VA doesn't give its CIO authority to implement the recommendations without approval from three undersecretaries in the agency, said Michael Staley, the VA's assistant inspector general for audits.

"They have a long way to go to mitigate their vulnerabilities and have a comprehensive IT security program," he said.

The GAO has issued multiple reports about VA cybersecurity problems since 2000, and the VA has received a failing grade in four of the past five years on an annual cybersecurity review by the House Government Reform Committee.

The agency seems to focus on individual medical centers or regional centers in fixing identified problems, instead of fixing those problems agencywide, Staley said. "The responses we get back to those recommendations is, 'We've take action at Site A,'" he said. "Then the next year, we ... go to Site B, and we see the same conditions exist."

Committee Chairman Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) asked Staley and GAO auditors who was responsible if VA officials ignored cybersecurity warnings. Auditors are working with the White House Office of Management and Budget to work on cybersecurity problems across the U.S. government, said Linda Koontz, GAO's director of information management issues.

"We need to figure out, what are the lines of authority?" Buyer said.

The VA's decentralized management, with its three divisions largely responsible for their own IT security, has contributed to cybersecurity problems, Buyer said. "VA's internal controls in data security have been grossly inadequate for years," he said.

Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

Recommend Digg Twitter ShareThis

Email Print Send Feedback Reprints

Jump to comments

VA

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER

Do You Know the 7 Steps to Successful Data Migration?

Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.

WHITE PAPER

Total Cost of Ownership of Server Computing Vs. PCs

Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.

WHITE PAPER

IDC White Paper: Linux in a Global Recession

Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.