Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Security
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

House panel: VA ignores cybersecurity warnings

The agency last month acknowledged losing personal data on millions of U.S. military personnel

June 14, 2006 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service -

U.S. lawmakers today questioned why the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) continues to suffer from cybersecurity problems despite multiple warnings from government auditors.

Members of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee asked government auditors why the VA has not acted on repeated cybersecurity recommendations. The hearing follows the VA's announcement last month that the personal data of 26.5 million U.S. military veterans and spouses was stolen from the home of a VA data analyst, who had the information stored on a personal laptop computer and an external hard drive. He was not authorized to take that information home.

The VA has said that the computer equipment -- not the data -- was the target of whoever stole it.

Some veterans received notices of the data theft by mail this week, nearly six weeks after the May 3 break-in. Rep. Bob Filner (D-Calif.) called the VA's response to the data theft "pathetic."

"If it were possible to approach the theft of veterans' and service members' records without emotions ... this situation might be even an interesting case study of lax policies, failed leadership and organizational arrogance," Filner said.

VA Secretary R. James Nicholson announced last month he had demoted two agency supervisors who failed to immediately tell him of the data theft. The analyst who took home the data against agency policy will also be fired, Nicholson said. As recently as last week, the VA has said there's no indication the stolen information has been used in identity theft schemes.

The committee will hear from Nicholson later this month.

Auditors with the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the VA's own inspector general's office said at today's hearing that they have no authority to force the VA to comply with their recommendations. In addition, the VA doesn't give its CIO authority to implement the recommendations without approval from three undersecretaries in the agency, said Michael Staley, the VA's assistant inspector general for audits.

"They have a long way to go to mitigate their vulnerabilities and have a comprehensive IT security program," he said.

The GAO has issued multiple reports about VA cybersecurity problems since 2000, and the VA has received a failing grade in four of the past five years on an annual cybersecurity review by the House Government Reform Committee.

The agency seems to focus on individual medical centers or regional centers in fixing identified problems, instead of fixing those problems agencywide, Staley said. "The responses we get back to those recommendations is, 'We've take action at Site A,'" he said. "Then the next year, we ... go to Site B, and we see the same conditions exist."

Committee Chairman Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) asked Staley and GAO auditors who was responsible if VA officials ignored cybersecurity warnings. Auditors are working with the White House Office of Management and Budget to work on cybersecurity problems across the U.S. government, said Linda Koontz, GAO's director of information management issues.

"We need to figure out, what are the lines of authority?" Buyer said.

The VA's decentralized management, with its three divisions largely responsible for their own IT security, has contributed to cybersecurity problems, Buyer said. "VA's internal controls in data security have been grossly inadequate for years," he said.


Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

VA

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

IT Jobs