Mainframe's midlife crisis: Security
Computerworld -
Twenty years ago, mainframes sat in tight glass houses, accessed by a limited list of select employees. Today, mainframes remain a mainstay of enterprise operations. All predictions of the mainframe's imminent demise have disappeared as quickly as those predicting the end of brick-and-mortar retailing. In fact, industry sources estimate that 30 billion Cobol transactions occur daily; that's more than the number of Web page hits in the same time period.
In today's enterprise, mainframes have shattered their glass houses and are accessible by a variety of network services. In addition to conventional users of core CICS or IMS-based transactions, large organizations (including many financial services companies) are shifting applications from Wintel to Linux on the mainframe to save costs and increase performance and reliability. And Web-based applications hosted on the mainframe's Linux or Unix environment enable millions of customers to access the core transactional data needed to conduct business.
With so much traffic from so many sources -- and new government regulations aimed at consumer privacy and corporate diligence -- it's time for companies to rethink how they secure the mainframe.
Fatigue, inexperience and overconfidence trump security
Marooned on islands, with limited outside connectivity, mainframes have always been relatively easy to administer and secure. It wasn't uncommon for an organization to literally have one mainframe technician per user. Now, it's one technician per 1,000 users. Across our customer base of more than 300 large companies, we're seeing the trend: Experienced mainframe help is overworked and hard to find. You can't just plug in a firewall administrator and expect him to find his way around a spaghetti works of applications and services that were written before that administrator was even born.
In addition to increased connectivity and staff scarcity and knowledge, one of the largest challenges for mainframe security is complacency and overconfidence. Most companies assume that mainframes are secure, simply because of their glass-house heritage. I recently visited a very large European bank that boasted about mainframe security. I made the wrong assumption; with so many applications hosted on the mainframe, it was relatively easy for an insider to abuse and compromise the system. Sensitive data could be copied, records deleted, and all traces of this activity could be removed.
In particular, mainframes are vulnerable to three major types of threats:
- Malicious data access: Hackers and trusted users have increased potential to access the mainframe's core data repository just like any other platform. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and other standards all point to the need to protect data accountability and integrity. The mainframe can't be an exception.
- Self-inflicted mistakes: A generation of mainframe masters is quickly retiring, and less qualified or less experienced technical staffers (often rushed and overworked) can inadvertently change code or settings to open up holes or deliver too much authorization to the system.
- Aged software: The strength of the mainframe is that you can continue to run the old reliable software without too much maintenance. But even mainframe software needs checks, patches and updates to close gaps or simply improve security.
Teaching an old dog new tricks
SecurityAdditional Resources![]() WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
![]() WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
![]() WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.
White Papers & WebcastsShare our Strength Lower the Cost and Complexity of a Mobile Workforce through Automation Top 10 Things to Know about Data Protection Managing Mobility: Improve Data Security, Compliance and Manageability Managing Secure File Transfer to Save Time, Money and IT Resources Ponemon Study: The Business Risk of a Lost Laptop Security Convergence Equals Network Security Cost Savings Airport Insecurity: The Case of Lost Laptops Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance Computerworld ReportsWhite PapersSponsored Links |



