Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

RIAA says it will continue fight, despite subpoena ruling

A privacy group, however, hailed the ruling

December 19, 2003 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service - The Recording Industry Association of America Inc. (RIAA), which has requested hundreds of subpoenas this year and filed 382 civil lawsuits against people who allegedly shared music files illegally, will continue its legal fight -- even without the benefit of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) subpoenas, the association said in a statement.
"This decision is inconsistent with both the views of Congress and the findings of the district court," Cary Sherman, president of the RIAA, said in a statement. "It unfortunately means we can no longer notify illegal file sharers before we file lawsuits against them to offer the opportunity to settle outside of litigation. Verizon is solely responsible for a legal process that will now be less sensitive to the interests of its subscribers who engage in illegal activity."
His comments came after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the industry group doesn't have the authority under U.S. law to subpoena the names of alleged peer-to-peer file traders from Internet service providers (see story). The appellate court overturned a lower-court decision that allowed the RIAA to subpoena Verizon Internet Services Inc. for the names of suspected copyright infringers without having to file lawsuits against the alleged file traders.
The RIAA's argument that subpoenas allowed in the 1998 DMCA apply to material transmitted through an ISP as well as to content stored by an ISP "borders upon the silly," the court wrote.
Verizon officials weren't immediately available for comment, but a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called the ruling a victory for Internet users.
"Internet users are the winners in the Verizon case," EFF staff attorney Wendy Seltzer said in an e-mail. "The effect of the appeals court decision is that we do not lose our privacy simply by connecting to the Internet. The ruling stops the record labels from taking our free speech rights as collateral damage in the campaign against the American music fan."

The DMCA doesn't allow for copyright holders to subpoena the names of ISP subscribers who simply use the ISP to access the Internet, wrote Chief Judge Douglas Ginsburg. "We are not unsympathetic either to the RIAA's concern regarding the widespread infringement of its members' copyrights, or to the need for legal tools to protect those rights," Ginsburg wrote in his opinion. "It is not the province of the courts, however, to rewrite the DMCA in order to make it fit a new and unforeseen Internet architecture, no matter how damaging that development has been to


Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

Jump to comments

Legislation/Regulation

Additional Resources

Xerox
By using solid ink technology only from Xerox, you could save up to 65% by printing color for the cost of black and white. Enter for a chance to WIN a PhaserTM 8860 network color printer!
Microsoft
Save time and mitigate security risk. Deploy it now.
Sybase
In this white paper, IDC analyzes the role of next-generation mobile enterprise platforms as organizations seek a more strategic deployment of mobile solutions.

Learn the important issues you must consider before starting your next mobility initiative. Get your mobility white paper from IDC now, compliments of Sybase.