Experts, IT managers say Microsoft should forget bounty, focus on security

Computerworld - WASHINGTON -- Microsoft Corp.'s $5 million reward fund to catch virus and worm writers drew mixed reactions today from IT security managers and experts, some of whom would rather see the company use the money to improve Windows security than chase bad guys.
Flanked by officials from the FBI, the U.S. Secret Service and Interpol, Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, detailed the program and its two first rewards, which were set at $250,000 each, for the authors of the MSBlast.A worm and the Sobig virus (see story).
The reward money, said Smith, is intended to help authorities "catch, prosecute and convict people who break the law by launching malicious viruses and worms on the Internet."
Law enforcement officials said they welcome Microsoft's help. "Efforts like this, which involve the private sector, are going to be critical to our success," said Peter Townsend, deputy assistant director of investigations at the Secret Service. With most of the nation's critical infrastructure under private-sector control, "this cannot be solved by the private sector alone; it cannot be solved by the government alone."
Connie Sadler, IT security director at Brown University in Providence, R.I., said the money would likely be better spent improving the security of the Windows operating system. "I would rather see Microsoft make a solid investment in prevention and containment" of viruses, said Sadler. Right now, it's up to users to build barriers that limit the damage from a virus or worm, she said.
Brown, for instance, has firewall rules that prevent one dorm from talking to another if a problem occurs, said Sadler. "It would be nice to see some network operating system that would help us do that," she said.
Hugh McArthur, information security officer at Reston, Va.-based Online Resources Corp., an online bill-processing firm, also had doubts about the reward's effectiveness. "At the highest level, it's one way of Microsoft making themselves a little bit better," said McArthur. "But I think it does not address the underlying issue that the vulnerabilities that the worms and viruses attack still exist.
"The resources might be better spent fixing those problems than going after [virus writers]\," he said.
Smith, in response to questions at today's news conference, said the reward isn't a substitute for improving the security of Microsoft's Windows software, but is a sign that the company recognizes that it needs "to move forward on multiple fronts" to address the virus problem.
Some security experts said the reward may help.
Rewards programs have worked successfully for the FBI and other law enforcement agencies and should work well in the digital realm as well, said Patrick Gray, a former FBI agent and head of the emergency response team at Atlanta-based Internet Security Systems Inc.
"It's unfortunate that things have come to this," Gray said. "But it's time to stop focusing only on the buggy software and go after the criminal elements that exploit [it] as well."
Eugene Spafford, director of the Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., said that if virus or worm authors "did it for bragging rights or as a general 'experiment,' then there is a chance that a reward might turn up leads."
But if the viruses are written by professionals -- such as viruses designed to support spam distribution -- then a reward will be less useful, said Spafford. "Identification and prosecution of authors to date has been poor, so this might really help," he added.
Microsoft's move is a "good news, bad news kind of thing," said John Pescatore, an analyst at Stamford, Conn.-based Gartner Inc. On the positive side, actions such as this will serve as stronger deterrents against malicious hackers and result in more of them being prosecuted, he said. "So it will help scare away some of the 20-year-olds that are writing these sorts of worms and viruses," Pescatore said.
On the other hand, "I hate to see software vendors diverting their management attention and money toward rewards programs, because rewards programs work only after the damage has been done," Pescatore said. "I would rather see them put the same money and attention on making their software safer in the first place," he said.
Additional reward announcements will be made after consulting with law enforcers, said Smith.

Read more about Security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.