Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Security
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

A big Microsoft mess: Patches gone bad

July 16, 2003 12:00 PM ET

PC World - Last winter, Devin Wood of Milford, Mass., installed Service Pack 1 for Windows XP. Right after that, his PC got slower, and he's been unhappy with it ever since. "I'm sick of watching my desktop icons draw like someone is inside my computer with an Etch-A-Sketch," says Wood.
We received many similar reports from readers after SP1 rolled out. Several months later, Microsoft Corp. said that it had released patches to fix the performance snags (see story). But now we get the bad news: Microsoft admits that it didn't address readers' problems, and the company says it has no plans to fix the situation at all.
Here's how the saga unfolded: When Microsoft first released the supposed fix, it told us that the only way to get help was to call Microsoft. Hordes of unhappy XP users picked up the phone. Some readers said company technicians told them there was no fix for XP performance woes. "The tech denied the problem [existed]," recalls Devin Wood. But other readers spoke to techs who were aware of the problem, and they received e-mail messages with a link to a fix. It turns out that some of these readers were directed to one patch, and others to a different [unrelated] patch. Neither fix took care of the problem. (If you installed either one of these two patches, your PC won't be affected, according to Microsoft.)

Double trouble
The first patch, a "hot fix" labeled Q815411, was aimed at a small set of corporate customers. Hot fixes are quickie patches that Microsoft creates when users run into specific problems.
"The patch was mislabeled," says Greg Sullivan, lead product manager with Microsoft's Windows group. "This enterprise hot fix was created for PCs running under very specific circumstances."
The second patch, labeled Q811493, was a revised security fix affecting Windows XP, 2000 and NT. Microsoft had to withdraw the original security fix because it introduced performance lags for some SP1 users. Visit "Buffer Overrun in Windows Kernel Message" and click Technical Details for Microsoft's notes about the reissued patch.
After this crazy runaround, we continue to receive readers' reports about sluggish PCs relating to SP1. Nevertheless, Microsoft doesn't believe that the problem deserves a patch.
"[We've] not received broad general feedback about performance issues with SP1," Microsoft's Sullivan tells us. "Therefore, [we're] not currently developing a widely applicable patch."
Some readers have uninstalled SP1 to get performance back. Visit "Microsoft Windows Service Pack 1 Readme" for Microsoft's notes on how to remove SP1. Sullivan doesn't adviseusers to do this, but it seems to be your only (extreme) option. Sullivan also says that, in general, you don't need SP1 to get future updates, although some updates (known as quick-fix engineering updates) do require SP1.
Microsoft's site doesn't offer an easy way to submit a complaint. Send your SP1 reports to bugs@pcworld.com.

Stuart J. Johnston is a contributing editor for PC World.


Reprinted with permission from

For more PC news, visit PCWorld.com.
Story copyright 2009 PC World Communications. All rights reserved.

Jump to comments

Security

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

White Papers & Webcasts

Death to PST Files
Download Now  

Web 2.0, Social Media and the Dark Web - A Web Criminals Paradise?
In this discussion, learn about the challenges of protecting your users from the potentially unsafe content hidden in the "Dark Web".

eGuide: Enterprise Security
Smart Security Strategies for 2010. Read now!  

Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance
How long can your Enterprise afford to be without your data? With an accelerated disaster recovery program, you never have to answer this...


IT Jobs