Steering vs. Repeatable

By Johanna Rothman

April 22, 2003 12:00 PM ET

Recommended

(8)

Digg

Twitter

Share/Email

Computerworld - "We're repeatable. We consistently and repeatably do the same stupid things over and over again." - senior test engineer

Process improvement experts emphasize the importance of having a repeatable process. However, many organizations misuse the "repeatable" to mean "not entirely chaotic." In process improvement terminology, "repeatable" means that the company has a documented product development process that includes project management, requirements management and QA processes. Although you may have a repeatable process in the sense that your organization does the same things repeatedly, it may not be repeatable in the process improvement sense of the word.


	Johanna Rothman consults on managing high-technology product development, focusing on project management, risk management and people management.You can reach her at jr@jrothman.com or by visiting www.jrothman.com.

Even in organizations that use the term "repeatable" correctly, there's another problem. Some people view their repeatable process as a substitute for thinking. One project manager asked me this question:

"If we have a process, all we have to do is follow it, right?"

It depends. If you think you "just" have to follow a process, you're repeatable. Repeatable can work for you, if you continually do the same kinds of projects. However, if you work on different kinds of projects, including long R&D projects, small projects with quick deliverables, and iterative delivery projects, then reconsider your process.

Is your process working for you on the current project? Has your process ever worked for you? Does it meet your needs for this project? I prefer to consider the needs of a particular project, before deciding on a process:

Do we know how to gather the requirements for this project? Should we use the design to iterate the requirements?

Is our design process appropriate for this project? Are we going through extra steps because our process tells us to, although the design is as complete as it needs to be for this project? Do we need to iterate on the design this time? Alternatively, is the design complete, and we're filling in the details with a series of projects?

What kinds of testing do we need on this project? How will we start testing at the beginning of this project? Do we need more exploratory testing this time? Do we need more automated testing this time?

Do our customers want a series of deliverables, or one major deliverable at the end? Does this mean we should choose a different lifecycle for the project?

What risks do we have? Do we expect to have to replan this project sometime or several times during the its lifecycle?

Recommend Digg Twitter ShareThis

Email Print Send Feedback Reprints

Jump to comments

Development

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER

Do You Know the 7 Steps to Successful Data Migration?

Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.

WHITE PAPER

Total Cost of Ownership of Server Computing Vs. PCs

Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.

WHITE PAPER

IDC White Paper: Linux in a Global Recession

Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.