Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Bush seeks terror warning integration center

January 29, 2003 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - President Bush last night called for the formation of an independent terrorist-threat integration center to enhance the ability of intelligence and law enforcement agencies and the private sector to share data and respond to the threat of imminent terrorist attacks.
During his State of the Union speech, Bush said it's imperative for the government to act quickly before future terrorist threats emerge. And while improvements in analysis and cooperation have taken place throughout the government since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Bush said, a centralized analysis center will ensure that the transformation is complete.
"Tonight, I am instructing the leaders of the FBI, the CIA, the [Department of] Homeland Security and the Department of Defense to develop a Terrorist Threat Integration Center to merge and analyze all threat information in a single location," said Bush. "Our government must have the very best information possible, and we will use it to make sure the right people are in the right places to protect our citizens."
This isn't the first time that such a proposal has been put forward.
Rep. Curt Weldon, (R-Pa.), the vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, called for the creation of just such a center in 1999 at the height of the U.S.-led NATO air war in Kosovo. Likewise, an advisory panel on the national response to weapons of mass destruction, led by former Virginia Gov. James S. Gilmore III, also recommended the creation of such an agency.
Weldon renewed his call for the center again on Sept. 11, saying the terrorist attacks might have been prevented had the government moved on his proposal to inject commercial data mining tools into the intelligence community and integrate the dozens of classified information-sharing systems.
Weldon's idea would have modeled the new agency on the Army's Information Dominance Center, which is part of the Land Information Warfare Activity (LIWA), at Fort Belvoir, Va. It was there that the Army took advantage of the skills of a former CIA profiler who used commercial data mining tools to produce an eight-page biography of a close associate of former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic. That was seven and a half more pages than the CIA was able to produce for Weldon, who led a congressional delegation to Vienna to negotiate an end to the war in Kosovo.
The U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, Fla., also tapped into LIWA's data mining capabilities and with that agency's help built a small version of the LIWA system. It then produced an entire profile of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist organization. Through that profile, the Special Operations Command made detailed recommendations to the Clinton administration in January 2001 about which individual cells to direct action against to cripple the organization. Those recommendations were never acted upon.
"All of that activity could have prevented or helped to prevent 9/11 from ever occurring," said Weldon, speaking in May in the House of Representatives.
"I briefed our Homeland Security director, Tom Ridge. He agreed with us, but he has not yet been able to achieve this new interagency collaborative center," Weldon said in May. "And that is an indictment of our government that the American people deserve to be outraged over."
At a news conference announcing the release of the advisory panel's fourth annual report last month, Gilmore said that information-sharing by government agencies "had only marginally improved." Cultural issues were largely to blame for that modest progress, said Gilmore.
"I, for one, would rather build upon the existing structures of the [FBI]," he said. "But the commission doesn't feel that way. The commission believes that you have to have a new organization with a different culture."






Jump to comments

IT in Government

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.

White Papers & Webcasts

Southern Company
Download Now  

IT Governance Podcast: IT Provider Forecasts $10 Million in Savings
In this podcast, learn how OTS was able to prioritize, then deliver, on the mission-critical demands and, in the process, project $10 million...

A New Approach to IT Governance
This 5-Minute Demo shows a new approach that lets IT quickly and easily realize the benefits of IT Governance.

Share our Strength
Download Now