Report questions i2 customer satisfaction with software ROI

Computerworld - After spending years of effort and millions of dollars, some users say they're not getting their money's worth on their i2 Technologies Inc. software investments, a soon-to-be-released report indicates.
Based on a survey of 22 companies that have deployed i2 products, 55% said they had not yet achieved a positive return on investment from their supply-chain-related applications after an average of 2.2 years of use. That information comes from analysts at Nucleus Research Inc., an independent Wellesley, Mass.-based research firm.
The major problem, according to a report due for release next week, is the length of time required to deploy the applications. Nearly 70% of the rollouts took longer than planned, said Nucleus Research.
Users, who were touted by Dallas-based i2 on its Web site, showed a lot of frustration over software that cost more, took longer to implement and did less than they had expected, said Rebecca Wettemann, an analyst at Nucleus. Two other analysts said the report was consistent with what they have heard anecdotally.
"I2's solutions are complex, as are the problems that they endeavor to solve," said Karen Peterson, an analyst at Stamford Conn.-based Gartner Inc. Moreover, until a year ago, the different modules were too heterogeneous to be configured and deployed in a standard way, she said. And in some cases, companies got rid of planning staff to accommodate i2's complex software.
"You don't typically take the software and drop it in place and have it run," said i2 Chief Marketing Officer Janet Eden-Harris. She said the findings of the report are difficult to refute because there are so many ways to calculate ROI or even the average cost of an implementation. I2 does provide metrics to customers as part of its rollout methodology, and most users are able to achieve ROI, she said.
Four users asked about the findings said that i2 software isn't exceptionally difficult to install and that they're achieving their desired results.
"I think an advanced planning solution implementation is harder than an ERP [enterprise resource planning] implementation," said John Mallon, director of supply chain management at Phoenix-based chip maker On Semiconductor Corp., which has been using i2 planning and fulfillment software for the past three years. "I'm a little bit of the opinion that some people who fail at it underestimate the difficulty of what they are getting into. Contrary to popular opinion, it's rocket science."
However, the company has saved $20 million through improvements in productivity and inventory management enabled by i2, he said. "It comes down to the