Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Hardware
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

FTC charges Rambus with anticompetitive acts

June 20, 2002 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service - Memory maker Rambus Inc. deceived a technology standards organization, resulting in harm to competition and consumers, according to a claim brought yesterday against the company by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The FTC's complaint claims that from 1992 to 1995, Rambus took part in standards-setting activity regarding synchronous dynamic RAM (SDRAM) technology with the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council Solid State Technology Association (JEDEC), but failed to disclose that it had also filed for patents to cover technologies involved in the standard. Concealing such facts is a violation of JEDEC's rules, the FTC said.
Los Altos, Calif.-based Rambus' conduct has put the company in a position to harm competition, since it could claim patent rights over the JEDEC SDRAM standard and collect royalties from manufacturers that use the standard in its product, the release said. In fact, the company has collected royalties from memory manufacturers including Toshiba Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. and NEC Corp. that range from $50 million to $100 million a year, the FTC said.
Rambus' anticompetitive actions have also harmed consumers by raising costs for SDRAM technology or by reducing the output of such technology, the FTC said.
"By issuing this complaint, the commission is sending a signal not only to Rambus but also to other companies. The message is this: If you are going to take part in a standards process, be mindful to abide by the ground rules and to participate in good faith," Joseph Simons, director of the FTC's bureau of competition, said in a written statement.
Rambus believes it fully complied with JEDEC's rules, according to a statement. The company filed a patent application for its memory technology in 1990, and was later invited by JEDEC to join its committee developing a related standard, the statement said.
Numerous private lawsuits have been filed against Rambus with similar allegations, according to the company. One case, involving Munich, Germany-based Infineon Technologies AG, was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in early June.
"Given that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is currently scrutinizing this matter, we are somewhat surprised to see this complaint by the FTC," said John Danforth, senior vice president and general counsel for Rambus.
Relief that the FTC could seek includes preventing Rambus from enforcing its SDRAM patents against manufacturers, the agency said.


Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

Jump to comments

Legislation/Regulation

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.