Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
IT Management
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Harvard Business Review Q&A: The Dark Side of Leadership

Beware of the forces that will try to neutralize your effectiveness, says Harvard University professor

June 3, 2002 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - To lead is to live dangerously, and leaders who ignore the danger can find themselves taken down, write Ronald A. Heifetz and Marty Linsky in this month's issue of the Harvard Business Review. The authors, who teach leadership at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, adapted the article from their new book, Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading (Harvard Business School Press, 2002).


Heifetz talked with Computerworld's Kathleen Melymuka about the perils of steering your organization through change.


Q: What's the "dark side" of leadership?


A:
It's the danger, and the danger is a product of the real or feared losses that frequently accompany change.


Q: So to the extent that I champion change, I'm in danger?












Ronald A. Heifetz is an author and teaches at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
Ronald A. Heifetz is an author and teaches at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

A:
Yes. When you ask people to develop competencies they currently don't have, you're asking them to go through a period of incompetence, and the loss of competence is a terrible thing, especially in IT.


Depending on how proud they are of their competence and how much learning they may need to do to develop new competence, they may fight quite ferociously against the validity of your initiative—and frequently in ways that will endanger your efforts and you personally.


Q: What do you mean endanger me personally?


A:
Rarely do I mean physical danger, though on occasions we have seen someone go berserk. In the vast majority of situations, the dangers are to one's reputation, career or institutional credibility.


Q: Where does this danger come from?


A:
You can find yourself "marginalized"—suddenly no longer in the loop, and people are not asking for your opinion. There's out-and-out attack. People can begin to take you on face to face in meetings in a way that reduces your credibility. Or your own people may seduce you by pushing you out on a limb to champion their perspectives without appreciating how much interference you're going to run into.

















This is the latest in a series of monthly discussions with authors of articles in the Harvard Business Review on topics of interest to IT managers.


You find yourself more and more isolated because you're not listening to others in the organization. It's seductive because it makes you feel heroic, and you don't discover till you're on the slippery slope that your credibility is eroded.


Or people will divert you from the tough issues. In IT, they may have you focus on the technical dimensions rather than the adaptive dimensions of the change IT is implementing.



Jump to comments

IT Management

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.