FBI claims technology is national security secret in mob case

IDG News Service - Federal prosecutors of an accused Mafia loan shark invoked the Classified Information Protection Act last Thursday in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey to keep the technical details of a computer keystroke logging tool secret.

U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas H. Politan granted the government's motion to privately review a detailed description of the device. This means the judge will review the technology of the key logger system without revealing it to the defense, while considering the government's claim that national security would be placed at risk if details became publicly known. If Politan decides that the government's national security claim is valid, then the defense -- and the public -- will see only a limited description of the key logger system's inner workings.

FBI agents acting with a warrant surreptitiously broke into the office of Nicodemo S. Scarfo Jr.'s in May 1999 to plant a keystroke logging device onto his computer. In an earlier raid on the office, FBI computer experts found one file protected with encryption the agents couldn't break. The keystroke logger enabled agents to record the file's password as Scarfo typed.

"There's a lot about the technology used by the FBI that could be publicly discussed, and deserves to be publicly discussed," said James Dempsey, deputy director for the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group in Washington. "This is a hugely important case, because the government says if it can't get what it wants by other means, it will break into your house and plant a device that records everything you type until it gets what it wants."

Court documentation regarding the Scarfo case is available online.

The U.S. Department of Justice, working with the FBI, charged Scarfo with racketeering, illegal gambling and loan- sharking as a member of what they call a Mafia crime family. Scarfo's father is jailed mob boss Nicodemo S. "Little Nicky" Scarfo Sr.

The warrant specifically required that the key logger device not be used to monitor Scarfo's Internet traffic; monitoring Internet content requires a warrant equivalent to one for a wiretap. Without details of the system's operation, the defense argued in its motion to suppress that it can't determine if the technology violated the warrant. Prosecutors argued in their motion for secrecy that if details of the key logger system are made public, it will be useless in further investigations and will jeopardize current ones.

Lawyers on the case are under a gag order and can't comment to the media about the trial.

The government's request to