Canada Considers Legalizing Cell Phone Jamming Systems
Begins 90-day public comment period; industry warns of possible legal challenges
March 12, 2001 12:00 PM ETComputerworld -
The Canadian government on Saturday kicked off a 90-day public comment period on whether to license technology aimed at preventing the inappropriate use of cell phones in places such as restaurants, theaters and concert halls.
|
Except for Israel, most countries, including the U.S., have blanket prohibitions against the use of any technology that jams or interferes with cell phone signals.
Industry Canada, the Canadian counterpart to the U.S. Department of Commerce, wants to obtain "the widest public views possible on the use of cell phone silencers," according to David Warnes, senior adviser for spectrum policy. Warnes said the Ottawa-based organization wants public input to help it make a decision on "whether and under what conditions license applications for these devices should be considered."
Canada will decide before year's end whether to change its current licensing policy, which prohibits the use of jamming technology except by public safety, law enforcement and other government agencies, Warnes said.
Marc Choma, a spokesman at the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association in Ottawa, said he believes that any technology that can block cellular phone use in Canada should remain illegal, primarily because it could interfere with public safety communications. "The public safety aspect is our greatest concern, since a lot of fire and police [departments] use the same frequencies as the public [cell] phone system," he said.
Choma said he believes that social pressure will eventually curb offensive use of cellular phones in inappropriate places. "As time progresses, society will dictate acceptable behavior," he said.
Possible Repercussions
The Radio Advisory Board of Canada (RABC), an Ottawa-based industry association of equipment manufacturers and service providers, said Industry Canada and the makers of cell phone silencers face potential legal repercussions if the technology is deployed.
In a position paper released in November, the Mobile and Personnel Communications Committee of the RABC said, in part, "Denial of service (especially emergency service) may have legal repercussions on the service providers, Industry Canada, the jammed provider and the public venue operator (concert hall, etc.) where some perceived harm or loss has occurred, particularly in situations where lives could have been or were lost."
Elliott Hamilton, an analyst at The Strategis Group in Washington, said that in his view, the use of cell phone jammers is a simple issue. "A business owner should be able to do what they want to do on their premises," Hamilton said. "I don't see anything wrong [with jammers], as long as their signal does not bleed into the public space."
Mobile/Wireless
Additional Resources



Learn the important issues you must consider before starting your next mobility initiative. Get your mobility white paper from IDC now, compliments of Sybase.
White Papers & Webcasts
Southern Company
Download Now
Lower the Cost and Complexity of a Mobile Workforce through Automation
Download This Resource Now!
Defending Against the Storm
Download Now
Managing Mobility: Improve Data Security, Compliance and Manageability
Download This Resource Now!
Ponemon Study: The Business Risk of a Lost Laptop
Download Now
Managing Laptops Outside the Office
Learn how you can reduce costs by tracking mobile computers no matter where they are located.
Airport Insecurity: The Case of Lost Laptops
Download Now
4G Ahead Video Program
Uncover the features and benefits of the two leading 4G technologies for enterprises considering future deployment.
Case Study: Roughing IT
Download Now
Complimentary Webcast: Taking a Strategic Approach to Enterprise Mobility
Download This Webcast Today!
