Skip the navigation

Ticketmaster accuses of misrepresenting judge's 'deep-linking' ruling

By Linda Rosencrance
March 31, 2000 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - Ticketmaster Online-Citysearch is accusing of misrepresenting a federal judge's ruling in a lawsuit filed against by Ticketmaster.
On Monday, U.S. DIstrict Court Judge Harry L. Hupp handed down the first ruling in the lawsuit, dismissing four of the 10 complaints filed earlier this year against the Costa Mesa, Calif.-based by Ticketmaster, in Pasadena, Calif. Hupp did agree to proceed with six of the complaints against
Both companies sell tickets to various events that can be purchased at their Web sites. However, also provides information as to where and how tickets it does not sell can be purchased. also provides consumers with a link to other ticket brokers.
Ticketmaster filed the lawsuit in U.S. District in California to prevent from hyperlinking — or linking to pages deep within its Web site — without authorization, bypassing Ticketmaster's home page and much of the advertising there. Ticketmaster claimed it was losing advertising from this type of "deep" hyperlinking.
In its lawsuit, Ticketmaster accused of illegal business practices, including violating federal copyright laws, false advertising, infringement of federal unfair competition laws, violating state unfair business practices, interference with business advantage and reverse passing off.
Here's an example of reverse passing off: When a retailer rips the labels off Gucci purses and replaces them with its own labels.
The judge has agreed to proceed to trial with these complaints. He dismissed Ticketmaster's breach of contract, trespass, unjust enrichment and state copyright laws.
But even though is claiming the judge's ruling speaks directly to the issue of hyperlinking, Ticketmaster CEO Charles Conn said in an interview yesterday that's perception of the ruling is misguided.
In a press release issued on Tuesday, said, "The federal court's decision is a validation of's mission to make it easier for consumers to get access to event information and buy tickets," said W. Thomas Gimple,'s co-chairman and CEO, in a statement. " . . . This decision supports's position that consumers should be free to surf the Web and gain access to information, without unwarranted restrictions."
Conn, however, said the judge didn't rule on the issue of deep linking and that the case isn't even about deep linking.
"Our case goes on as before with the substance in six (of our) complaints going forward," Conn said. "It is a complete inaccuracy what was put in the press release. Our case was not about deep linking. The judge said deep linking in and of itself is not illegal, but what we're saying is when it is coupled

Our Commenting Policies