Survey: Most Oracle shops don't mandate use of security patches
Computerworld - A lack of corporate mandates to quickly install Oracle Corp.'s security patches may be leaving many Oracle database installations exposed to vulnerabilities for extended periods of time, according to survey results released last week.
In a pair of online surveys jointly conducted by the Independent Oracle Users Group (IOUG) and Oracle between May and August last year, only 26% of the 150-plus respondents said their companies require the vendor's quarterly patch updates to be applied on all systems.
Another 6% said they are required to install the patches on critical systems only, the IOUG and Oracle reported. Meanwhile, 30% said their companies don't have any policies for Oracle's patches, while 32% said database administrators have to do risk or cost-benefit analyses to justify the patching of databases.
In addition, the survey results showed that most of the respondents aren't keeping up with Oracle's patch releases. Only 30% said they typically install patches before the company issues its next batch of fixes, according to the report. Twenty-five percent said they were one update cycle behind, while 26% said they were off by two to four cycles. Another 11% said they hadn't installed any of Oracle's patches.
Oracle typically issues dozens of patches across its entire product suite as part of the quarterly updates.
Patching databases in particular is a complex task that can require months of labor and significant system downtime. But the fact that many companies haven't even set policies for dealing with Oracle's patches is startling, especially since databases are such important corporate assets, said Ian Abramson, the IOUG's president.
"I think the feeling in those organizations is that since databases are a little more isolated than the desktop, there's less of a [security] concern," said Abramson, director of the enterprise data group at Thoughtcorp, an IT services firm in Toronto.
Oracle didn't respond to a request for comment. But in a blog posting, Eric Maurice, the company's director of software security assurance, said that Oracle and the IOUG will work together to promote broader adoption of policies for deploying patches.
He also said that Oracle will "explore ways" to improve its patch documentation to try to make the process of testing patches easier and faster for users.
This version of the story originally appeared in Computerworld's print edition.
Read more about Security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.
- Enable secure remote access to 3D data without sacrificing visual perfomance Design and manufacturing companies must adapt quickly to the demands of an increasingly global and competitive economy. To speed time to market for...
- Virtually Delivered High Performance 3D Graphics "A picture is worth a thousand words." That old phrase is as true today as it ever was. Pictures (i.e., those with heavy...
- Best Practices for Securing Hadoop Historically, Apache Hadoop has provided limited security capabilities. To protect sensitive data being stored and analyzed in Hadoop, security architects should use a...
- Top Tips for Securing Big Data Environments: Why Big Data Doesn't Have to Mean Big Security Challenges Organizations must come to terms with the security challenges they introduce. As big data environments ingest more data, organizations will face significant risks...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Responding to New SSL Cybersecurity Threat The featured Gartner research examines current strategies to address new SSL cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities. All Security White Papers | Webcasts
Our new bimonthly Internet of Things newsletter helps you keep pace with the rapidly evolving technologies, trends and developments related to the IoT. Subscribe now and stay up to date!