Microsoft, Oracle get busy plugging security holes
Computerworld - Microsoft Corp. and Oracle Corp. each dropped a bevy of software patches on their users last Tuesday, with Microsoft issuing 11 updates to plug a total of 20 security holes and Oracle releasing 36 separate fixes.
Microsoft's monthly batch of patches was designed to fix vulnerabilities in Windows, Office, Internet Explorer and other products. The company rated 11 of the flaws as "critical," its highest severity level, while eight were pegged as "important" and one as "moderate."
The patch release also marked the launch of Microsoft's Exploitability Index, which gauges the likelihood that attackers will be able to exploit the various vulnerabilities within 30 days. Eight of the 20 flaws received the highest ranking -- meaning the development of consistently functional exploit code for them is likely.
Microsoft announced plans to add the exploitability predictions in August, saying that the index was designed to help users prioritize their patching plans.
But that "doesn't mean that the enterprise can do less work," cautioned Andrew Storms, director of security operations at software vendor nCircle Network Security Inc. Storms said that in the initial index, it looked like Microsoft had "put together a pretty good view into the future, based on the data they had."
Oracle, which issues its patches quarterly, released a smaller-than-usual -- though still plentiful -- number of fixes last week. Of the 36 flaws that were patched, 11 can be exploited remotely, the company said.
In many cases, though, companies -- especially large ones -- are reluctant to bring down production databases to install new patches. Many are also wary about deploying untested patches in live database environments. As a result, there is usually a considerable lag time between when a patch becomes available from Oracle and when it gets widely deployed.
In fact, Sentrigo Inc., a vendor of database security software, polled 305 Oracle database administrators between August 2007 and last January and found that two-thirds of them apparently weren't installing Oracle's security patches at all. Such practices can leave companies dangerously exposed to attacks , said Slavik Markovich, Sentrigo's chief technology officer.
This version of the story originally appeared in Computerworld's print edition.
Got something to add? Let us know in the article comments.
Read more about Security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.
- Enable secure remote access to 3D data without sacrificing visual perfomance Design and manufacturing companies must adapt quickly to the demands of an increasingly global and competitive economy. To speed time to market for...
- Virtually Delivered High Performance 3D Graphics "A picture is worth a thousand words." That old phrase is as true today as it ever was. Pictures (i.e., those with heavy...
- Best Practices for Securing Hadoop Historically, Apache Hadoop has provided limited security capabilities. To protect sensitive data being stored and analyzed in Hadoop, security architects should use a...
- Top Tips for Securing Big Data Environments: Why Big Data Doesn't Have to Mean Big Security Challenges Organizations must come to terms with the security challenges they introduce. As big data environments ingest more data, organizations will face significant risks...
- What should I look for in a Next Generation Firewall? SANS Provides Guidance With so many vendors claiming to have a Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), it can be difficult to tell what makes each one different....
- Responding to New SSL Cybersecurity Threat The featured Gartner research examines current strategies to address new SSL cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities. All Security White Papers | Webcasts
Our new bimonthly Internet of Things newsletter helps you keep pace with the rapidly evolving technologies, trends and developments related to the IoT. Subscribe now and stay up to date!