Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Security
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Making enemies, but needing allies

Security issues have been ignored a long time. Change is needed, but that rubs some people the wrong way.

September 22, 2008 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - My name is mud within IT right now.

Our fledgling security organization is starting to run into some significant relationship challenges. As we're beginning to build our information security program from scratch, we're causing some friction.

In my company, information security is part of the IT department, but like several other IT disciplines, it reports directly to the CIO. As a result, the infosec and IT support teams are peers, a relationship as uneasy as that of siblings. Over the past couple of weeks, tensions between our teams have been rising sharply. In fact, we could be looking at full-scale interdepartmental warfare. How did this come to this pass?

As we try to bring security to an acceptable level, we are introducing new policies and standards that are being met with hostility by the IT support teams. They will have to perform some of the remediation we have identified, such as patching and updating devices, cleaning up firewall rules and implementing redundant systems. So, basically we are telling them what to do -- which they interpret as telling them how to do their jobs. And they don't like that.

This company does not tolerate change well, and the reaction has been less than mature. In fact, the company displays the lowest level of organizational and personal maturity that I have ever seen, and this attitude is apparent in our dealings with the rest of the IT organization. Reactions have ranged from pushback in response to the demands we have placed on the server teams to finger-pointing and name-calling.

When you apply ISO 27001 criteria to this company's security processes, the shortcomings are clear. Most of the processes are ad hoc and chaotic, depend on heroics, and rely on key people with specific knowledge and unique skill sets. What I want to do is to introduce a higher level of organizational maturity, with repeatable processes, common language and defined tasks. I hope one day soon to have uniform processes based on well-defined policies and solid methodologies.

But that is in the future. For now, we are trying to improve our corporate maturity by advocating a better set of practices, and that isn't going over well. And the information security team is the only group attempting to do this. Not Winning Allies

Trouble Ticket

At issue: New processes and policies are needed, but relationships with the rest of IT are suffering.

Action plan: Try to defuse the situation without calling in backup -- the CIO.

The result so far has been ugly. All of the IT departments are complaining that infosec is asking too much. They are complaining loudly and with varying levels of tact (none of which are very tactful at all). While upper management remains confident that my group is doing the right thing, our stock among our peers is sharply declining, and they don't want to deal with us.



Jump to comments

procedures

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

What People Are Saying

White Papers & Webcasts

Death to PST Files
Download Now  

Web 2.0, Social Media and the Dark Web - A Web Criminals Paradise?
In this discussion, learn about the challenges of protecting your users from the potentially unsafe content hidden in the "Dark Web".

eGuide: Enterprise Security
Smart Security Strategies for 2010. Read now!  

Disaster Recovery 2008: Reduced Costs and Improved Performance
How long can your Enterprise afford to be without your data? With an accelerated disaster recovery program, you never have to answer this...


IT Jobs