You write that good promises are voluntary. I suspect that a lot of our IT readers are smiling at that concept. By voluntary, we mean the provider has options other than yes. A more powerful member of the organization goes to a less powerful one and says, “You will do this project by May 13 with these resources, and it will have this functionality.” There are a couple [of] problems with this. Psychologists tell us that if people are coerced into a promise, they don’t feel they own it, and keeping promises isn’t ingrained in the organization. At the margins, that matters in terms of quality and delivery. Also, if people aren’t allowed to say things other than yes, critical information — such as other commitments that could get in the way of execution — is lost.
Good promises are explicit and yet constantly renegotiable. How do I strike that balance without chaos? If two parties are committed to make a promise work, it’s not that hard. Typically, you want to have the notion of minimum specification: What’s the minimum that we agree is critical? You specify the “what” rather than the “how.” One of the most interesting aspects of agile development is that the development team is basically having a renegotiation each time it goes back to the users.
You say that good promises are mission-based. Why is it so important for both sides to discuss not only what will be done but why it matters? If a customer makes a request and doesn’t bother to tell you why, you typically conclude, “They think I’m too stupid to understand the why,” or “They don’t know why themselves,” or “They don’t think I’m important enough to bother telling.” But if people agree that something matters, they’re more likely to nudge it up their internal priority list. And if you understand what the military calls the commander’s intent, you can often figure out a better way to do it than you initially agreed to. CIOs do this all the time.
- 15 Non-Certified IT Skills Growing in Demand
- How 19 Tech Titans Target Healthcare
- Twitter Suffering From Growing Pains (and Facebook Comparisons)
- Agile Comes to Data Integration
- Slideshow: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
- iOS vs. Android: Which is more secure?
- 11 sure signs you've been hacked
Changing the Way Government Works: Four Technology Trends that Drive Down Costs and Increase Productivity
This paper discusses four technology-based approaches to improving processes and increasing
productivity while driving down department and agency costs.
- Shifting Gears: The Value of Customer-Driven Quality in Manufacturing In today's competitive manufacturing market, the customer must be the center of the quality universe. This paper details how manufacturers can improve customer...
- Aberdeen Group: Marketing Analytics for Manufacturing: Forging Customer Insights There are no recalls for poor marketing. Manufacturers need to get their customer intelligence and messaging right the first time. Learn how.
- The Brave New World of Customer-Centric Manufacturing The Unique Opportunity for Manufacturers to Better Understand their Consumers
- Live Webcast Increasing the Value of Your Reports and Dashboards Learn how incorporating other analytical capabilities such as predictive modeling and visualization can increase the value of your reports and dashboards by providing...
- Testimonial: Cystic Fibrosis Trust Peter Hawkins, the Head of IT for Cystic Fibrosis Trust, discusses the role CommVault's Simpana software platform plays in improving the company's information...
- Increasing the Value of Your Reports and Dashboards Learn how incorporating other analytical capabilities such as predictive modeling and visualization can increase the value of your reports and dashboards by providing... All Management White Papers | Webcasts