Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
IT Management
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Simple Is Better

November 20, 2006 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - Simple. That’s the word that keeps coming to mind about the news that Sun Microsystems has turned Java into open-source software. There are no new custom software licenses involved, no complicated deals, no funky motives, no dark rumblings of conspiracy. It’s as if Sun simply pointed to Linux and said, “See that one? That’s what Java will be like.”

It’s especially simple compared with the murky, muddled FUD-fest that was Microsoft and Novell’s announcement about their Linux collaboration. That still has the open-source crowd up in arms.

And that simplicity is good news for Sun and Java — and for IT.

It’s easy to understand how Sun could open-source Java. The company has run out of ideas for wringing money out of it. Java no longer generates the buzz it did a decade ago, Sun has never struck oil in the Java development tools market, and the once-looming threat of Microsoft or Hewlett-Packard hijacking Java is long gone.

Put simply, Java is obsolete as a product for Sun, even though it’s still very useful to the rest of us. With the stakes now so low for Sun, the company can afford to declare victory and walk away from the table.

It’s what Sun didn’t do that’s remarkable. Sun spent years battling to maintain control of Java. There was the three-year lawsuit with Microsoft over changes Microsoft made to how Java worked on Windows — followed by another Java-related antitrust suit against Microsoft. There were Sun’s previous efforts to be open-source-ish in its own way — the Java Community Process, the Sun Public License and the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL).

Anyone knowing that history would have expected Sun to open-source Java on Sun’s own terms — say, with a CDDL license, some kind of specialized terms for use, maybe a few intellectual property strings still attached.

Amazingly, Sun didn’t do any of that. The Java open-source license is identical to the Linux license. No specialized terms. No strings. Nothing new. Sun actually did keep it simple.

And to make things simple for people who were already using Java under the previous CDDL license, Sun kept that license, too.

And while the open-source army will get its crack at coming up with new ideas and improvements, Sun will keep a hand in to prevent Java from forking.

In sum, the biggest immediate impact on corporate IT of open-source Java is ... no impact at all. Nothing to adjust to. Nothing to run past the lawyers. For IT, operationally, it means nothing.



Jump to comments

novell

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.