New York faces DOJ suit over voter accessibility law

Computerworld - The state of New York is being threatened with a federal lawsuit for failing to comply with the Help America Vote Act, which requires actions such as the development of statewide voter-registration databases and the installation of e-voting systems or other voting machines that are handicapped-accessible.
The legal threat came in a letter sent to state officials last month by Assistant U.S. Attorney General Wan Kim. In the letter, Kim said that New York is "further behind" in HAVA compliance than any other state and that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has authorized lawsuits against the state and its elections board.
Kim added, though, that the U.S. Department of Justice would rather negotiate a settlement with New York officials than go through "costly and protracted litigation."
HAVA was passed by Congress in 2002 in an attempt to improve the federal elections process. All 50 states were required to meet the law's provisions by Jan. 1, 2006, or face sanctions by the DOJ.
Many state officials interviewed in recent weeks acknowledged that they remain in violation of the statute, but only New York and its board of elections have been publicly warned that a lawsuit is possible.
A spokesman for the New York Elections Board acknowledged this week that the state lacks handicapped-accessible voting equipment and has not yet created the required voter database.
The board is discussing the status of its efforts with the DOJ, the spokesman said, adding that the state was delayed in starting HAVA projects while it waited for the New York legislature to create vendor certification processes and other rules. The legislation was finally passed last July.
The spokesman said state officials expect work on the voter registration database to be completed before the September federal primary election. The elections board is also speeding up the certification process for handicapped-accessible voting machines, he said.
New York could be forced to return some of the $200 million it has received for HAVA compliance work if the requirements aren't met.
A DOJ spokesman declined to say what penalties might be imposed or to offer any further information on the matter.
Officials in some states claim to be compliant with HAVA, but a number of other states are still scrambling to meet the law's requirements.
Spokesmen for the secretaries of state in Texas and Ohio, for example, said that those states are fully compliant with HAVA, whereas officials in California and Connecticut acknowledged that they have more to do.
In a survey conducted late last year by the National Association