WMF Vulnerability Sparks Patch Program
When the need to patch a major Windows hole arises, our security manager sees an opportunity to implement a process that's been resisted.
Computerworld - The Windows Metafile (WMF) vulnerability, which emerged in the last week of 2005 and was resolved with a patch that Microsoft released off its regular patch schedule at the end of the first week of 2006, wasn't good news at all. But I managed to wring a good outcome out of the situation, since it allowed me to give some structure to our patch management process.
Before this threat arose, efforts to deploy a patch management process had been met with excuses. Resources were short. A Systems Management Server (SMS) upgrade was being deployed. And as a general rule, engineers are resistant to patching because it could harm their ability to work. When the WMF vulnerability came to light, I saw an opportunity to finally institute a patch management process without listening to a lot of moaning. Unfortunately, it sometimes takes a serious incident or the threat of one to bring about change in an IT organization.
What made the threat posed by the WMF vulnerability particularly potent was one way a hacker could take advantage of it. With the WMF vulnerability, all a hacker has to do is embed malicious code in an image, place the image on a Web site and then lure unsuspecting users to that site. Once the user browses the Web site, his operating system will execute the malicious code contained in the image -- no downloading or clicking on a link is necessary.
Even though I hadn't heard of any incidents, I didn't want to take any chances. I've been through several other incidents involving vulnerabilities in the past, and it's never fun to clean up the mess. This WMF vulnerability just reeks of long nights in the data center operations war room.
My strategy for establishing a patch management process was fairly straightforward. My first priority was to get all of our desktops patched for the latest WMF vulnerability. We sent an e-mail to all 8,000 employees advising them to enable Windows Update so that critical patches would be installed automatically, or to click on a link to a Microsoft Web site where they could download only the WMF patch. We gave the employees 24 hours to comply, and then we used SMS to push the patch to all of the desktops.
With the WMF problem properly disposed of, the next step was to ensure that all desktops were current with critical patches. My security team reviewed all of the critical updates that Microsoft released in 2005 and made a recommendation on which


- Excel 2010 Cheat Sheet
- Register for this Computerworld Insider Cheat Sheet and gain access to hundreds of premium content articles, guides, product reviews and more.
- Driving Secure Enterprise File Sharing and Syncing in the Enterprise
- GroupLogic's new activEcho is the industry's only secure Enterprise File Sharing and Synching solution that balances the need for simplicity for the end...
- The Enterprise File Sharing Option
- Enterprises and IT departments need to address several critical security issues when considering file sharing and syncing products. Many of today's solutions do...
- Security Strategies to Virtualizing Internet-Facing Applications
- The IT organization at Intel has set a goal to transition their enterprise to a private cloud for their Office and Enterprise applications....
- Cloud Security Planning Guide
- Cloud security considerations span protecting hardware and platform technologies in the data center to enabling regulatory compliance and defending cloud access through different...
- Cloud Security Vendor Round Table
- This vendor round table guide will help you to evaluate different cloud technology vendors and service providers based on a series of questions... All Security White Papers
- Live Webcast
Data Privacy and Protection in Production Environments: New Research from Ponemon Institute - Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT / 10:00 AM PDT
In a recent study conducted by Ponemon Institute, fifty-five percent of respondents... - Data Privacy and Protection in Production Environments: New Research from Ponemon Institute
- Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 1:00 PM EDT / 10:00 AM PDT
In a recent study conducted by Ponemon Institute, fifty-five percent of respondents... - Security Certifications 101 - BlackBerry and all those acronyms what do they mean and why they matter?
- FIPS, Common Criteria, CAPS, AISEP, NFC, NIST, Fraunhofer SIT, CESG, DSD - these are just some of the government and industry certifications which...
- BlackBerry PlayBook OS 2.0 Security Overview
- The presentation provides an overview of BlackBerry PlayBook OS 2.0 security capabilities and features, including: BlackBerry® Balance™ technology, BlackBerry® Bridge, data-at-rest protection, and...
- BlackBerry NFC Security Overview
- The presentation on NFC security will provide an overview of the security protections built into the BlackBerry platform to protect users, application developers...
- Playing Defense: Staying on Top of Your Disaster Recovery Game
- When it comes to disaster recovery, rapidly growing data volumes, distributed computing models, and new technologies all combine to present an ever-changing playing... All Security Webcasts