Judge questions Microsoft project delays
The project is related to the company's 2002 antitrust settlement
October 26, 2005 12:00 PM ETIDG News Service -
A U.S. District Court judge monitoring Microsoft Corp.'s antitrust settlement with the U.S. government scolded company lawyers today because the company recently announced a lengthy delay in a project to improve technical documentation for its communications protocols.
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia questioned why Microsoft has pushed back the completion date of one of two technical documentation projects announced in February from early 2006 to October 2006 or later. The two projects were intended to help Microsoft comply with the judge's order to share proprietary communications protocols, part of the settlement Kollar-Kotelly approved in late 2002.
"If it's an issue of resources, then put them in," Kollar-Kotelly told Microsoft lawyers during an antitrust compliance hearing. "Do what it takes to get it done."
The judge also questioned why Microsoft had proposed to portable music player manufacturers that if they shipped Windows Media Player in their software packages, they could include only it and no competing media software. The exclusive proposal, made during the past three months, violates the antitrust settlement, Kollar-Kotelly said.
"This should not be happening at this point in the decree," Kollar-Kotelly said. "I realize people make mistakes, but this should not be happening."
Microsoft reversed course on the exclusivity proposal after it received an outside complaint and issued a final draft to media player companies days later, Microsoft lawyer Charles "Rick" Rule said. The proposal was made by a low-level employee at Microsoft, and the company promptly informed music player manufacturers they weren't required to honor an exclusivity agreement, he said. Microsoft reported the complaint to the U.S. Department of Justice, he said.
"At this point, I believe there's no lingering doubt about the nonexclusivity of the program," Rule said. "We regret this happened ... but we took immediate corrective action."
Kollar-Kotelly questioned why internal controls at Microsoft didn't catch the Media Player proposal. It's likely Microsoft would have caught the proposal if it hadn't received a complaint, Rule answered.
Kollar-Kotelly spent most of the hearing focused on delays in the technical documentation project. The judge ordered Microsoft to license its communication protocols to other IT vendors as part of the November 2002 antitrust settlement between the company and the U.S. government. The quality of the technical documentation for those protocols is one of the major remaining issues in the settlement, an one lawyer for the plaintiffs complained that the company hasn't lived up to the agreement.
Microsoft and the plaintiffs in February announced two projects intended to improve
Reprinted with permission from
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Legislation/Regulation
Additional Resources



Learn the important issues you must consider before starting your next mobility initiative. Get your mobility white paper from IDC now, compliments of Sybase.
White Papers & Webcasts
Oracle Accelerate - Not Just Smart but Timely
Download Now!
Data in Action: Making the Planet Smarter
Register Now
Why BI is Ripe - Now! - For Businesses of Any Size
Download Now!
The Workday User Experience Video
Watch Workday's Creative Director, Scott Lietzke, discuss the business-centered design philosophy at Workday.
Rapid Implementation: The New Age of ERP
Download Now!
Business Process Framework Demo
Learn about Configurable Business Processes and Calculated Fields. Watch Now!
Manager Experience Demo
Go beyond self-service solutions to perform more effectively. Watch Now.

