Update: Microsoft to pay IBM $775M in antitrust settlement
Claims were based on findings in the U.S. case against Microsoft
July 1, 2005 12:00 PM ETIDG News Service -
WASHINGTON -- Microsoft Corp. will pay IBM $775 million and give it another $75 million in credit under an antitrust settlement announced by the two companies today.
The settlement resolves all discriminatory pricing and overcharging claims stemming from the U.S. government's mid-1990s antitrust case against Microsoft, the companies said in a statement . The settlement also resolves most other IBM antitrust claims, including those related to its OS/2 operating system and SmartSuite products. IBM's claims of harm to its server hardware and server software businesses are not covered by the settlement, however.
The settlement of private antitrust claims by IBM focused only on the desktop-related antitrust issues addressed in the U.S. government's antitrust case against Microsoft, said Scott Brooks, an IBM spokesman.
The settlement resolves claims arising from the U.S. government's antitrust case against Microsoft, in which U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson found that IBM was hurt by Microsoft's antitrust practices.
Both companies said they were pleased by the settlement. With the agreement, the two companies "move ahead, at times cooperatively and at times competitively," Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel and senior vice president, said in a statement.
Microsoft can afford to make the agreed upon payment, which isn't exorbitant, and IBM can use the money, so the settlement seems favorable to both parties, said Rob Enderle, principal analyst at Enderle Group in San Jose.
The one sticking point for Microsoft is the exclusion of IBM's harm claims regarding its server hardware and server software, Enderle said. By not settling those in this agreement, IBM leaves itself the option of taking additional legal actions against Microsoft with regard to servers, especially in Europe, where the European Union's antitrust litigation is still ongoing, Enderle said.
"Clearly, Microsoft would like to put a cap on those [claims], but IBM was successful in leaving that unsettled, which is wise pending the outcome of the European litigation," Enderle said.
Last year, the European Commission -- the EU's executive branch, with antitrust powers -- ruled against Microsoft in an antitrust case, in a decision that the company is appealing. The commission determined the software maker had abused its dominance in desktop operating systems to gain an unfair advantage in related markets, including servers. The commission fined Microsoft $662 million and ordered the company to open up interfaces for its workgroup server software.
In the case with IBM, Enderle said, the provision for $75 million worth of Microsoft software is also interesting, considering IBM competes head-to-head against Microsoft on a lot of infrastructure software segments,
Reprinted with permission from
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.
Legislation/Regulation
Additional Resources



White Papers & Webcasts
Forrester Consulting - Optimizing Users and Applications in a Mobile World
Learn how to successfully deploy a WAN optimization solution that is specifically tuned for a mobile environment!
Faster, Cheaper and Easier to Maintain
Can you afford not to upgrade your servers to today's advanced, energy-efficient technologies?
Effectively Implementing Datacenter Automation
Effectively select and deploy the best datacenter automation solution today!
The State of PCI DSS Compliance at Organizations Today
Download this resource today!
Aligning IT to Business: The Rising Importance of Application Delivery Networks
Application Delivery Networking (ADN) will play a vital role in helping enterprises incorporate strategic technologies to achieve business initiatives.
IDC Research Report: The Business Value of Consolidating on Energy-Efficient Servers
Download this Resource Now!
HP Technology Guide for Scalable Business Solutions
Download This Resource Now!
Mitigate Risk, Lower Costs and Improve Network Efficiency
Create a stable IP network that not only meets today's challenges, but is flexible enough to also meet future demands.
