Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Update: Microsoft to pay IBM $775M in antitrust settlement

Claims were based on findings in the U.S. case against Microsoft

July 1, 2005 12:00 PM ET

IDG News Service - WASHINGTON -- Microsoft Corp. will pay IBM $775 million and give it another $75 million in credit under an antitrust settlement announced by the two companies today.
The settlement resolves all discriminatory pricing and overcharging claims stemming from the U.S. government's mid-1990s antitrust case against Microsoft, the companies said in a statement . The settlement also resolves most other IBM antitrust claims, including those related to its OS/2 operating system and SmartSuite products. IBM's claims of harm to its server hardware and server software businesses are not covered by the settlement, however.
The settlement of private antitrust claims by IBM focused only on the desktop-related antitrust issues addressed in the U.S. government's antitrust case against Microsoft, said Scott Brooks, an IBM spokesman.
The settlement resolves claims arising from the U.S. government's antitrust case against Microsoft, in which U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson found that IBM was hurt by Microsoft's antitrust practices.
Both companies said they were pleased by the settlement. With the agreement, the two companies "move ahead, at times cooperatively and at times competitively," Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel and senior vice president, said in a statement.
Microsoft can afford to make the agreed upon payment, which isn't exorbitant, and IBM can use the money, so the settlement seems favorable to both parties, said Rob Enderle, principal analyst at Enderle Group in San Jose.
The one sticking point for Microsoft is the exclusion of IBM's harm claims regarding its server hardware and server software, Enderle said. By not settling those in this agreement, IBM leaves itself the option of taking additional legal actions against Microsoft with regard to servers, especially in Europe, where the European Union's antitrust litigation is still ongoing, Enderle said.
"Clearly, Microsoft would like to put a cap on those [claims], but IBM was successful in leaving that unsettled, which is wise pending the outcome of the European litigation," Enderle said.
Last year, the European Commission -- the EU's executive branch, with antitrust powers -- ruled against Microsoft in an antitrust case, in a decision that the company is appealing. The commission determined the software maker had abused its dominance in desktop operating systems to gain an unfair advantage in related markets, including servers. The commission fined Microsoft $662 million and ordered the company to open up interfaces for its workgroup server software.
In the case with IBM, Enderle said, the provision for $75 million worth of Microsoft software is also interesting, considering IBM competes head-to-head against Microsoft on a lot of infrastructure software segments,


Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2009 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

Jump to comments

Legislation/Regulation

Additional Resources

EFD vs. HDD - What You Need to Know
WHITE PAPER
Enterprise flash drives provide a new Tier 0 storage layer capable of delivering high I/O performance at a very low latency. Proper use of EFDs in an Oracle environment can deliver increased performance compared to fibre channel drives. Read the recommendations for identification of the best DB components for EFDs.
Gartner Research Report: Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers, 2009
WHITE PAPER
The market for products to improve the delivery of application software over networks remains dynamic and innovative. Vendors focused on solving enterprises' most-pressing application problems have become the top players.
Eight Criteria for Server Load Balancing
WHITE PAPER
Server load balancers are a simple yet highly effective means to scale an application environment while ensuring its availability. Today's solutions should also address application performance and security. Read about the top eight criteria you should consider when choosing a server load balancer and how Citrix NetScaler meets those requirements.

White Papers & Webcasts

The Workday User Experience Video
Watch Workday's Creative Director, Scott Lietzke, discuss the business-centered design philosophy at Workday.

Business Process Framework Demo
Learn about Configurable Business Processes and Calculated Fields. Watch Now!

Manager Experience Demo
Go beyond self-service solutions to perform more effectively. Watch Now.


IT Jobs