Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Receive the latest technology news and information.
Security
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
Cloud Computing
View all newsletters




Privacy Policy
 

Safest Places On the Web

April 8, 2005 12:00 PM ET

Computerworld - The security breaches at ChoicePoint Inc. and LexisNexis Group have us all asking the same questions: Where is my data safe? And how do I know? These are the questions I recently set out to answer, and I found some surprising results.


First, the bad news. There still isn't one widely recognized seal of approval that says a company has top-notch privacy and security. The padlock symbol on your Web browser means the session is encrypted, and Web security seals such as ScanAlert Inc.'s "Hacker Safe" mark say the Web site is protected against all known vulnerabilities. But these methods don't address the broader, organizational security practices at issue in the ChoicePoint and LexisNexis incidents.


So how do we know where our data is safe? The best answer I found is this: We need to look for privacy policies that address the Safe Harbor privacy principles negotiated by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the European Union. Why? Because these principles represent best practices in privacy and security, and companies that publicly commit to them are at great legal risk if they don't adhere to them. A solid privacy policy is our best guarantee of data safety.


So which companies meet this criterion? I reviewed the privacy policies of the top 50 most-visited Web sites—as measured by Jupiter Research—and the Forbes 100 largest companies in the world. It's an admittedly small sample, so I also asked Truste and my privacy professional counterparts in other organizations for their recommendations.


What did we find? This is where the surprises sprang up. (See accompanying charts.)


The largest U.S. companies are better than their European counterparts about including the European privacy principles in their online privacy notices. The EU considers the U.S. an "inadequate" destination for personal data, but you couldn't tell it by reading corporate privacy policies. Among the Forbes 100, U.S. companies comply with an average of 3.9 of the seven EU Safe Harbor principles, compared with 2.3 for EU companies.


Another surprise was the mediocre scores of the privacy policies on the most-visited U.S. Web sites. Visitors to these popular sites apparently aren't deterred by their general lack of strong privacy commitments. The typical top-50 site posts a privacy notice that addresses only 4.4 of the EU Safe Harbor principles.


I wasn't surprised that the companies with the strongest privacy policies are concentrated in the financial and technology industries, where profits depend on consumer trust in data privacy. Seventeen of the top 20 sites hail from these sectors.


I also wasn't surprised that several companies outside the Forbes Global 100 made the final list. It's easier for a smaller company to consistently enforce a strong privacy policy than for a large corporation operating in several markets and jurisdictions to do so.



Jump to comments

Privacy

Additional Resources

WHITE PAPER
Approximately 60 percent of data migration projects overrun time or budget, while some fail completely. Download this white paper, "Enhancing Your Chance for Successful Data Migration," to learn the critical steps you need to take to execute a data migration project with minimum cost and risk to your business.
WHITE PAPER
Read the Gartner research note to learn why the TCO of a server-based computing deployment used to deliver all applications to users is around 50% lower than that of an unmanaged desktop deployment.
WHITE PAPER
Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends. This IDC White Paper presents the results of an IDC survey of 330 companies in Western Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Americas that measures the receptiveness to Linux and takes into consideration changing views driven by the disruptive economic environment that businesses face today.