
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Outsourcing Stories
|
March 26, 2001 (Computerworld) -- The fact that we live in a litigious society is undeniable. But to what extent has lawsuit lunacy penetrated the world of IT? Are disaffected companies running to court over broken IT contracts as never before?
It all depends on how you read the numbers. "I sense that the IT world over the past decade has gone from becoming relatively less to relatively more litigious than the rest of the economy," says Tom DeMarco, a consultant at Cutter Consortium in Arlington, Mass. "Big systems integrators often have 50 concurrent lawsuits pending."
DeMarco, who is exposed to many IT-related lawsuits in his work as a litigation consultant, says the equivalent of 10% to 15% of many corporate IT budgets are consumed by legal costs. Court calendars are clogged with often baseless lawsuits brought by people who would rather fight than talk, he says.
Although precise numbers are hard to come by, there's evidence to suggest that the number of IT outsourcing lawsuits has increased significantly during the past few years. While many executives rail against filing suit at the drop of a hat, the situation is likely to get worse before it gets better.
Whether it's a matter of late delivery or unmet requirements, experts say that most problems arise from a failure to communicate.
CIOs can help their companies avert the pain of litigation by spelling out specifications and timetables upfront and by maintaining channels of communication with the vendor during implementation.
Bruce Webster, a consultant at PricewaterhouseCoopers in New York, recently completed a study of 25 years of litigation resulting from IT systems failures. His sampling of cases lends credence to the view that IT litigation has trended upward.
Of the 120 cases Webster studied, five were filed in 1974-76, 18 in 1988-90 and 23 in 1994-96. A decrease to 19 filings in 1997-99 "reflects a time lag in our ability to gather data on the most recent cases, rather than an actual downward trend in such legal actions," according to Webster's report.
But Webster is cautious about exaggerating the trend's significance. "My impression is that litigation is on the rise because the number of IT projects has been increasing steadily over the last 25 to 30 years," he says. "Before that, it was relatively rare to embark on a major project. Today, it is a fundamental necessity in both business and government."
![]()
![]()
![]()
Avoiding Conflict
Agree ahead of time to expectations, promises and contingencies.
Include performance and compatibility requirements, anticipated life span and acceptable levels of defects in systems specifications, as well as required functionality.
Clearly define key terms, conditions and activities.
Review documents up and down the chain of command in both organizations to make sure all relevant personnel understand what's promised and what's expected.
Implement small, comprehensible and workable systems at first before expanding into the desired large systems.
Plan to migrate off IT technologies that your organization doesn't control in order to avoid unplanned obsolescence.
Get expert legal and IT guidance before signing anything.
Act quickly when problems arise.
Work with the vendor to achieve the desired goal.
Source: Bruce F. Webster, "Patterns in IT Litigation: Systems Failure (1976-2000)," PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York, 2001![]()
So does an increase in raw numbers indicate a litigation explosion? According to Rick Matlus, research director at Stamford, Conn.-based Gartner Group Inc., the ratio of litigated IT projects to the total has actually remained steady over the past few years. "I have been checking with law firms that do this kind of work, and they have not seen an increase in litigation," he says. "Overall, less than 3% of all IT deals end up in arbitration or in court."
The Blame Game
In any event, when IT projects do fail, it's often easier for companies to blame the vendor for defective products or sleazy sales techniques than to take responsibility for any shortcomings themselves. In Webster's study, customers were five times more likely to initiate a lawsuit against vendors than vendors were to sue customers.
DeMarco says organizational politics often lead to unreasonable customer expectations, which in turn spawn irreconcilable differences with vendors. "Authority uses fear to get people to knuckle under and accept the feasibility of a desired result, no matter how unreasonable," he says. If the CEO says a project must be completed within a year, then that expectation is set in stone.
The corporate blame game also tends to fuel litigation, says DeMarco. Once a project goes awry, those responsible would rather cover up their poor deal-making than try to fix it. "Litigation is a way to defer blame," he says. "The typical lawsuit can take three, four or five years. Litigation has the beneficial effect of deferring judgment."
One of the other factors that plays into the surge in IT litigation is the role that CEOs, chief financial officers and other senior business executives play in deal-making with vendors. "The projects are pitched to those with a stake in the company's profitability," says Joe Auer, a Computerworld columnist and president of International Computer Negotiations Inc. in Winter Park, Fla. "The vendor claims that outsourcing will drop x cents per share to the bottom line, and the executives start calculating their bonuses."
But vendors aren't necessarily the ones at fault. "The customer doesn't always perform what they need to do to get the product implemented," says Ann Jordan, general counsel for PeopleSoft Inc. in Pleasanton, Calif. "It is easier to blame the vendor than to go to your own management and say, 'We could have done a better job.' "
In October, PeopleSoft settled a lawsuit in which Newark, Del.-based W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., maker of the Gore-Tex fabric used in outdoor apparel, accused the software vendor, along with consultancy Deloitte & Touche LLP, of botching the installation of a human resources management system. Although Gore didn't specifically complain about PeopleSoft's product, it did contend that PeopleSoft foisted New York-based Deloitte's services on Gore and claimed that the consultancy wasn't up to the task.
The lawsuit charged that the software problems interrupted the firm's business operations. Terms of the settlement remain confidential, according to Jordan.
Adam Cohen, an attorney at the law firm Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP in New York, says he's seen similar situations, frequently involving failed Web site projects. In such cases, "the developer often points to the client and says that they didn't provide deliverables [in a timely manner] under the contract," Cohen says. But "it is rarely black and white. Each side has duties and obligations to the other."
Webster points to other problems on the customer side. "I've seen cases where the project champion leaves the company," he says. "His replacement has little or no stake in the project succeeding. Sometimes, there is also a small but influential group of users who like the way things were done before."
In some cases, problematic software implementations are the result of how they're handled - or mishandled - internally, according to Rich Reed, vice president for information and network technology at the Chubb Group of Insurance Cos. in Warren, N.J. "There has to be a program of change management that surrounds implementation of enterprise applications," he says. "The failure to educate users on operational changes will create potential problems."
When It's Time to Walk Away
Bill Donovan, CIO at Charlotte-based ocean transportation and logistics services firm CSX Lines LLC, says he and his CEO were both hot under the collar and ready to sue a Big Five consultant a few years ago over the unsuccessful implementation of a customized system for booking and tracking cargo. Both sides agreed to walk away from the project and call it a wash after the consultant waived any further payments under the contract.
But Donovan gleaned some important project management lessons from the experience. "We gave [the consultant] full accountability for the success of the project," he says. "Since then, we've never given an outside firm accountability. We manage the team in-house and hire contractors as needed."
Many CIOs recommend documenting both customer and vendor expectations from the get-go, which is precisely the job of Stuart Kliman, founding partner of Vantage Partners LLC, a Cambridge, Mass.-based consulting firm. Kliman helps companies find better ways to relate to one another, a task that's easier said than done. "Both vendors and customers are frustrated with the dynamic at play, but neither is comfortable taking the first step to change it," he says.
A language barrier almost brought down the relationship between The Leading Hotels of the World Ltd. (LHW), a New York-based marketing and reservations service, and SimNet Computing Ltd., a Japanese systems integrator. LHW hired SimNet in 1998 to hook up the LAN at its Tokyo installation with its WAN. SimNet installed $50,000 of software not authorized by LHW. When LHW refused to pay, SimNet threatened to sue.
"It was a communications problem," says Edward Nesta, LHW's CIO. "There was a discrepancy between what they thought we said vs. what was really approved."
Nesta and his team negotiated their way out of litigation by extending SimNet's service contract, thus allowing the vendor to recoup its losses. "We have an excellent working relationship with them today," he says. But Nesta surmises that the original problem could have been avoided had he placed a few key people on the spot to work directly with SimNet.
Buxbaum is a freelance writer in Elizabeth, N.J. Contact him at pab001@aol.com.
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Business Continuity Zone Data Center Management Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone Business Intelligence and Analytics Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|

Computerworld Technology Briefing: Meetings @ the Speed of Business For large organizations, Web conferencing gives a major boost to collaboration among far-flung offices. For smaller companies, experts say Web conferencing is no longer a luxury but a necessity for everything from webinars to customer presentations. But the real value lies in saving soft costs and in increases in productivity.Download this briefing
|
Intercept Spam & Viruses With MessageLabs MessageLabs is offering a complimentary 30 day trial of its managed Anti-virus and Anti-spam security solutions. MessageLabs guarantees complete protection against all know and unknown email threats. By providing 24 hour support, your business can increase productivity and decrease risk. Register for a complimentary trial and receive a free datasheet.Download this white paper now!
|
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |