
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Hardware Stories
|
February 06, 2006 (Computerworld) -- Corporate IT managers who never seem to have enough CPU power, disk space, bandwidth or funding might take comfort from U.S. climate scientists. Computerworld's Gary H. Anthes recently talked with two of them and learned that even having access to the world's most powerful information systems is not enough.
Patrick Heimbach is a research scientist in physical oceanography at MIT, and James Hack heads up climate modeling at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. Both scientists use their own organizations' computer systems, as well as those at supercomputer centers around the U.S.

![]()
Patrick Heimbach is a research scientist in physical oceanography at MIT ![]()
Heimbach: We are trying to see if we can simulate, if we can understand, what the ocean has been doing over the last couple of decades. Are we heading toward a warmer world? Is [warming due to] internal variability of the [oceanic and atmospheric] system, or is there something we are doing to the system?
Do you have the computational power to do that?
Heimbach: What we ultimately would like to run we can't currently fit on any computer. We would need on the order of 20,000 processors, and probably two orders of magnitude faster processors. Each supercomputer center allocates a certain amount of computing time to a specific group. So we have to size down the problem we are addressing for that specific machine.
So it seems you must beg, borrow and steal computer resources for this work.
Heimbach: We have to find the cycles where we can find them. But even for the machines that are available, if we really wanted to go to the actual [spatial] resolutions that we need, we probably would not be able to fit those problems on those machines. Give us any machine, and we can immediately fill it with an interesting problem, and we'll still have the feeling we are limited.

![]()
James Hack heads up climate modeling at the National Center for Atmospheric Research ![]()
Is the Internet adequate for connecting you to the supercomputer centers you use around the U.S.?
Heimbach: Transferring several terabytes of data from NASA Ames [Research Center] to MIT is just overwhelming to do in a reasonable time. As of a year ago, we were limited by the 100Mbit/sec. bandwidth of the network that connects our department to the outside world. The best sustained rates that could be achieved were on the order of 55Mbit/sec. That would bring us to a transfer time of 1.7 days per 1TB of data.
We now have better connection to the high-speed Internet2 Abilene network, with its 10Gbit/sec. cross-country backbone. The bottom line still is we need much higher bandwidth, less network congestion and smart transfer protocols, such as the large-files transfer protocol [bbFTP], that minimize CPU load.
Hack: The so-called sneakernet continues to provide the best bandwidth for moving large data sets between computing centers -- shipping data on tapes or disk via overnight services. We are engaged in some emerging computational projects that will generate hundreds of terabytes per experiment. Moving that data is a significant challenge. Storage and access to that data for analysis purposes is a comparably challenging technical task.
How adequate is supercomputer capacity in the U.S. for scientific research?
Hack: One could argue that there will never be enough supercomputing capacity. In [a] sense, scientific progress is paced by the availability of high- performance computing cycles. And the problem becomes more acute as the need to address nonlinear scientific problems in other disciplines, like material science, computational chemistry and computational biology, continues to grow.
There remains some controversy about global warming. Could better climate models and/or better computer technology help resolve that?
Hack: For many scientists, it's not a question of whether the planet will warm, but more a question of how much the planet will warm and what form the regional distribution of that warming will take. Answering... these questions will require additional levels of sophistication in global climate models, such as improved resolution and extending existing modeling frameworks to include fully interactive chemical and biogeochemical processes. These kinds of extensions are... extremely expensive in computational terms. We will require a minimum of a twenty-five-fold improvement in computational technology to enable the next-generation model [in] three to five years.
Heimbach: You need to run coupled ocean-atmosphere simulations over 10 to 100 years. We think that these models, and the underlying model errors, are still such that we need to do more basic research to understand the errors better. That's what we are trying to address.
Should the federal government be doing more to fund supercomputer research and supercomputer capacity?
Hack: The federal government should treat supercomputer technology in the same way that it treats other strategically important areas, like those related to national defense and national security. It's too important to the nation's scientific and economic competitiveness to be left to chance.
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone Enterprise Solutions Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone The Data Center Management Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|


The Impact of Messaging and Web Threats Messaging, internal and Web-based threats are increasing in number and severity. The risks to organizations large and small are real problems that users and their employers face if they do not establish adequate defenses against this growing variety of threats.Read this Osterman Research paper to learn how organizations must implement a layered defensive strategy to protect against all types of threats and how Sunbelt Software can help. Download this white paper now
|

Get Into Gear!Check out our new personal technology section -- TechGear -- for the latest on those cool gadgets that you just gotta have! Host Mike Elgan provides hands-on reviews and analysis of the stuff that makes IT fun. Head to TechGear
|

| Detect, identify, and locate RF interference in 802.11 WLANs. AnalyzeAir software provides IT network professionals with the vision they need into the hidden world of RF, providing them with the ability to see the spectrum in a visible and intelligible format. AnalyzeAir software lets you see, monitor, analyze, and manage all the RF sources and wireless devices that influence your Wi-Fi network's performance and security, even if those devices are unauthorized or transient. AnalyzeAir Trial Software v3.1 highlights the features found in AnalyzeAir Software using a set of saved spectrum files. Replay the data and experience the visibility that AnalyzeAir Wi-Fi Spectrum Analyzer provides. Note: The trial software is limited to a player version only. It does not communicate with an AnalyzeAir PC card so it does not collect actual spectrum data. Register for this trial now.
|
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |