Computerworld
Quick Menu
Search



Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Finance
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Computerworld 2007Subscribe to Computerworld
40 years of the most authoritative source of news and information for IT leaders.

Massachusetts continues push on Microsoft antitrust appeal

The state's appeal is set for oral arguments Nov. 4
Nancy Weil, IDG News Service   Today’s Top Stories   or  Other Legislation/Regulation Stories  
 

Sign up to receive Legislation/Regulation Resource Alerts

July 18, 2003 (IDG News Service) -- The U.S. District Court remedy in the Microsoft antitrust case doesn't stop the software maker's anticompetitive behavior, nor does it "deprive Microsoft of the marketplace benefits achieved through its misdeeds," and so it should be tossed out by a federal appellate court, the Massachusetts attorney general argued in a document filed Wednesday.
"If this is the remedy in a case of this magnitude, then there is little reason why any monopolist or would-be monopolist should hesitate to embark on a similar course of unlawful conduct," says the document, filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The court filing is the latest in a series of briefs filed by Massachusetts and Microsoft Corp. concerning remedies proposed by the state that are more stringent than those in the settlement approved by the District Court.
Microsoft has argued that the Massachusetts proposal would benefit the company's competitors and not consumers and that its recommended remedies are "extreme."
Massachusetts remains the lone holdout state in the antitrust case, refusing to sign on to U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly's remedy ruling of last November that approved a settlement agreement worked out by plaintiffs and Microsoft. Eighteen states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Department of Justice were plaintiffs in the antitrust case, in which Microsoft was found to have an illegal monopoly through which it anticompetitively used its market dominance in operating systems to make inroads into other areas and to squelch competition.
West Virginia dropped its appeal of the settlement ruling last month, leaving Massachusetts to continue its fight alone. State Attorney General Tom Reilly earlier this month announced that his office is investigating whether Microsoft is violating terms of the settlement agreement (see story).
The Massachusetts appeal is set for oral arguments on Nov. 4.
The appellate court brief takes the existing settlement agreement and the District Court to task, arguing that "Microsoft's illegal conduct was serious, its consequences were serious, and the failures of the decree are serious.
"The failures of the district court's remedy are profound," the document says. "It fails to stop Microsoft's illegal conduct and does nothing to restore competition to the monopolized market or to prevent Microsoft from engaging in similar means to the same unlawful end. It is predicated upon findings and conclusions that reflect critical misunderstandings of the liability theory in this case, and upon a record devoid of evidence that it would accomplish anything meaningful."
Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said yesterday that it is notable that Massachusetts stands alone in refusing to accept the final judgment in the case. "It's been very clear through this process that the court thoroughly reviewed these issues and rejected many of the additional sanctions that Massachusetts seeks because they [the sanctions] were not good for the software industry or the economy," he said.
The company will continue to "underscore the potential harm of the sanctions that Massachusetts seeks," he said, adding that "our real focus remains on full and complete compliance of the terms of the court's final judgment."
Massachusetts has proposed that Microsoft be required to unbundle its operating system from all middleware products and also contends that Kollar-Kotelly erred by not making Microsoft disclose certain Windows application programming interfaces to third-party developers and release Internet Explorer code in an open-source license.
The final judgment approved by Kollar-Kotelly sets up restrictions related to Microsoft's licensing agreements, orders the company to release some of its intellectual property and forbids retaliation against PC and software makers that offer, or consider offering, products that compete with Microsoft.





Reprinted with permission from

IDG.net
Story copyright 2008 International Data Group. All rights reserved.


Print this Story Send Us Feedback E-mail this Story Digg! Digg this Story Slashdot this Story
Read more posts or See all Blogs
At 10, Google reiterates commitment to CIOs
Microsoft explains Seinfeld-Windows TV ad: just a 'teaser'
Continuing coverage: Google's Chrome browser
More top stories...
iPhone 3G owner sues Apple, AT&T over dropped calls, app crashes
Mozilla: Firefox is faster than Chrome
Upcoming Microsoft patch lineup could be 'massive,' says researcher
Users of Windows XP SP3 who try out IE8 Beta 2 won't be able to uninstall either one under certain circumstances.
Google has gone from innovative upstart to fat-and-happy industry leader in what seems like record time. Preston Gralla explains.
Microsoft's latest beta of IE8 includes better tab management, new services such as Web Slices and Accelerators, and the new 'porn mode.'
These leading-edge graduate schools are moving at the pace of the IT workplace, delivering coursework that's relevant to today's IT professionals.
Reviews, analyses, how-tos, visual tours, hot issues and predictions about Microsoft's new OS.
Four years from now, the IT field will be a vastly different place. Will you be ready?
All Zones
Application Performance Zone
Business Continuity Zone
The File Data Management Zone
Security Management Zone
ITIL Best Practices Zone
The SAS Zone
Business Intelligence and Analytics Zone
Windows Protection Zone
Identity & Security Management Zone

Ads by TechWords

See your link here
Computerworld Executive Briefing: The Compliance Era
Get this briefing free (a $195 value), for a limited time, courtesy of VeriSign.
The new Computerworld report, The Compliance Era, explains why regulatory compliance has zoomed to the top of the IT agenda and shows how real-world IT executives are dealing with the storage, security and privacy challenges. Get this briefing free (a $195 value), for a limited time, courtesy of VeriSign.
Download this executive briefing download
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center
From Laggard to Leader: Transforming the Data Center
Register for this complimentary live webcast today!
Go to the webcast 
Qualified Security Assessors are not created equal
Download this whitepaper, free for a limited time, compliments of VeriSign!
(Source: VeriSign) Learn how a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) can help you acheive full compliance and security in this white paper, presented by VeriSign and Computerworld.
Download this white paper go
White Papers
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services.
Death to PST: Hidden Cost of Email Mismanagement
Extend, Replace, or Convert; which is the best way forward for COBOL Applications?
The Trend from Unix to Linux in SAP Data Centers
View more whitepapers