
Subscribe to
Computerworld
or
Other Databases Stories
|
January 16, 2006 (Computerworld) -- Twenty-four years ago, I raised a furor in the database management systems industry. As a rookie analyst -- a stock analyst, no less -- I argued that the then-dominant hierarchical/network data architectures should and would be replaced by "index-based" systems. Over the next few years, I was proved right, as inverted-list and relational products took over the DBMS market.
Recently, I've argued a contrasting position: XML-based data architectures should and will get an important IT role in applications where tabular data-bases don't do a great job. Thus, I think that IBM's and Microsoft's more- or-less native XML storage systems will be more than niche curiosities, and Oracle will soon have to offer a worthy competitor.
There are three basic parts to the argument:
1. There are applications for which XML offers a superior logical architecture to SQL. These fall into two groups. First, there are apps in traditional categories -- CRM, SCM and so on -- that don't have naturally concise relational schemas. We can say that the natural schema is highly variable, or we can say that the overarching schema that takes this variability into account is horrifically complex. Either way, stuffing these apps into a relational straitjacket causes a lot of unnecessary grief.
Second, there are apps that deal with new kinds of complex, dynamic documents. Before XML, either these documents didn't exist at all or their processing couldn't be fully automated.
2. For many of these applications, native XML storage is more efficient than traditional relational storage. Before Microsoft's and IBM's recent announcements, there were two ways to store XML in a relational database. First, since an XML document is a string of characters, you could stick it in a Clob, or Character Large Object. But updating or retrieving specific data values inside the Clob is very inefficient; you basically have to process the whole document.
Alternatively, the XML can be "shredded" into a series of relational tables. But that can make for some very complex updates and joins. So for documents that have complex structures, neither approach is appealing. Native storage is a superior alternative.
3. XML storage won't have the same drawbacks that hierarchical/network products did. Hierarchical systems failed because reusing data in multiple apps was too difficult. Today, however, RDBMS vendors integrate XML and relational storage. You can access XML documents through SQL and your tables through XQuery.
|
|
Print this Story |
|
Send Us Feedback |
|
E-mail this Story |
|
Digg this Story |
|
Slashdot this Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Zones Application Performance Zone Enterprise-Class Security Zone Enterprise Solutions Zone The File Data Management Zone Grid Computing on Windows Zone Security Management Zone ITIL Best Practices Zone The SAS Zone Storage Virtualization Zone The Data Center Management Zone |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|


Maturing Your Demand Management Practices A CIO's guide to maturing your demand management practices. Executive Coach Susan Cramm shares six key requirements for demand management. Learn how to gather, evaluate, categorize and prioritize IT requests based on business objectives. Read it now.
Download this white paper
|

Best Places to Work in ITWhere can you earn top dollar, get the best benefits, the latest IT and more? Find out in our 14th annual survey. |

| Try Fluke Networks'
EtherScope Analyzer on your network FREE Quickly solve the wide range of problems you encounter - 10, 100 and Gigabit, twisted pair and optical fiber, LAN or wireless LAN. The EtherScope Analyzer combines the essential tools you need to monitor network traffic and switch interfaces, discover devices, networks, VLANs, access points, mobile clients and more. See the power of this portable network analyzer on your network. Request free trial now
*Terms and conditions: Evaluation units are available only for a limited time and will be scheduled on a first-come first-served basis. Not available in all geographies. Limited quantities available; customers requesting evaluation units may be waitlisted for the next available unit. It will be at the discretion of Fluke Networks to accept or decline requests for this free evaluation. |
|
SAS Information Management Kit
SAS is the leader in business intelligence and analytical software and services. Only SAS offers leading data integration, storage, analytics and business intelligence applications within a comprehensive enterprise intelligence platform. SAS gives 97 of the top 100 companies in the 2007 Fortune 500 THE POWER TO KNOW®. |
Webcast: The Information Management Roadmap
Imagine high-quality data, cleansed, analyzed and delivered throughout your organization. Join Computerworld, IT visionary Thornton May and a panel of experts to learn how SAS® can help you make it happen. View this webcast
|
Research Report: Information Management Initiatives at Midsize and Large Organizations
See the top-line results of this Computerworld sponsored survey to see how IT and business leaders are handling information management implementation.
Download this report
|
White Paper: Information Management: Better Information for Winning Decisions.
This white paper explains how the SAS Information Evolution Model aids companies in assessing how they use this information to make strategic decisions and drive business.
Download this white paper
|
| About Us Advertise Contacts Editorial Calendar Help Desk Jobs at IDG Privacy Policy Reprints Site Map |
|
CIO The Industry Standard |