Capitalizing on the buzz around green IT, Seagate and Western Digital have released new "green" hard drives designed to use less power (in part by spinning more slowly than the latest generation of drives) and produce less heat (thus requiring less cooling).
The question is: Does performance suffer as a result? I tested two 2TB SATA internal drives to find out.
How we tested
In order to test the drives, I installed them into a Dell Dimension desktop running Windows XP SP3 and connected them to Promise Technology's SATA300 TX4302 card, which enables older systems to benefit from SATA technology using a standard PCI slot.
I tested the drives with HD Tach 3.0 from Simpli Software using its grueling Long Bench test, which uses 32KB blocks for reads and writes across the entire drive. I also used version 2.55 of the HD Tune benchmark test (since it's always a good idea to try more than one benchmark when you can).
Seagate's new $299 Barracuda LP SATA 3Gb/s 2TB drive ("LP" meaning low power) spins at 5900 rpm (most lower-power drives spin at 5400 rpm).
According to Seagate, the drive uses as much as 50% less electricity than standard desktop hard drives and up to 25% less than competitors' "green" drives. It uses 6.8 watts when in operation, which is 15% less than the 1.5TB Seagate Barracuda drive I tested in October 2008. It uses just 5.5 watts when in idle mode.
Among its other environmentally friendly properties: Seagate claims that 70% or more of the materials used in the drive are recyclable and that the drive meets the RoHS (restriction of hazardous substances) environmental standards. According to Seagate, the drive is also well suited to newer low-power PCs, networking appliances and personal attached storage devices.
Seagate uses the slogan "The new low-power drive that won't slow you down" on its data sheet. However, its performance certainly isn't as good as the current slate of full-power traditional drives; you'll pay a 10% penalty for eco-friendliness. On the HD Tach test, the drive had a burst speed of 113.8MB/sec. and an average read speed of 92.4MB/sec. Compared to my results when I tested last year's 1.5TB Barracuda, burst speed is 13.5% slower and read speed is 10% slower.
HD Tune reported an average transfer rate of 74.3MB/sec. (a 20% decline over last year's Barracuda), a burst rate of 77.9MB/sec. (16.5% slower), and an average access time of 12.2 milliseconds (an 8.9% drop).
People seeking leadership roles in business, or even those in search of funding for a start-up, may...
Your customers are unlikely to be happy if second-level human support is nonexistent or just too hard...
Mention artificial intelligence and a discussion about the robot wipeout of humankind is sure to...
Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Sponsored by Informatica
Intel does not object to John McAfee using his personal name in connection with his business, but it...
Windows 10's cumulative updates have ballooned in size, and a similar bloat will affect the Windows 7...
Petaflop supercomputers have become standard. But be prepared to pay: These machines can be as...
Google’s new flagship phones, the Pixel X and XL, offer fast performance and the latest hardware. But...