One of the best ways to see what's changed with the ninth and newest version of Microsoft's Internet Explorer is to tune into beautyoftheweb.com and watch the words, images, and DIVs bounce around, luring the world into pretty images and information that can't sit still. "Tune in" is the appropriate verb because the experience is closer to consuming television than what the Web was once supposed to be, an endless library filled with serious knowledge that might come from an underground physics bunker in the mountains.
To get the full effect and begin to understand the shifting dynamics of the industry, the flashy graphics must be seen three or four times, but not just because they're so visually compelling. The challenge is to look at the site in different browsers and see just how similar and how slightly different it happens to be.
[ Which of the leading browsers is the perfect balance of features, speed, innovation, and flexibility? See "The best browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, or Safari?" ]
Seeing the bouncing blocks in other browsers shows just how Microsoft is following the path of HTML5 blazed by the other browser groups and embraced by the standards committees. In the past, Microsoft had some of their own standards for vector graphics, but now they've decided that the pack is leading and they must keep up. The experience is very similar in all of the browsers, and that's because most of the website is written in jQuery, which manipulates the positions of the images and brings the pages to life.
But while very similar across browsers, the experience is not exactly the same, and the differences are subtle enough that Microsoft even included a little note that tells visitors who are running other browsers that the experience will be better in IE9. The biggest difference is an MP4 movie that sends a bluish, water-like wave swirling across the screen. The movie won't play in Firefox 4.0 but it does show up in Chrome. The other differences may only be figments of my imagination. The dancing images seem to move more smoothly in IE9, but I'm not sure how to quantify this effect or even test whether I'm just imagining it.
Windows under the hood Microsoft is pushing the fact that their browser is more tightly integrated with the graphics layer of their operating system, a fact that lets IE9 use the graphics board to handle much of the image swooshing. Some of Microsoft's demos even include frame rate meters just like video games.
It's important to note that the other browser groups are following this lead, and this is a way that Microsoft is regaining some technical control. Mozilla, for instance, says that its newest version of Firefox is more tightly integrated with DirectX, the video frame software layer that was once mainly used by game programmers. This helps Microsoft because it supports the idea that the Windows OS is a good platform for watching the Web.
This balance is also good for the open Web because it seeks to establish HTML5 as the premier vehicle for content developers. The open Web and the desktop platform are no longer as dominant as they once were, as the alluring world of smartphones and tablets steal mindshare. When people can answer their email, read books, and watch television through the new generation of mobile devices, no one needs their desktops for anything but homework and those dreadful, long-form memos that the boss forgets to read. Goodbye Web, hello app store.
Still, Microsoft is no longer in the driver's seat, and it shows in other aspects of IE9. Many of the more visible features are also catching up to the lead of Firefox, Chrome, and to a lesser extent Opera. The buttons and menus are now much more like Chrome. The plug-in environment wants to emulate Firefox.
Web developers will like F12, a built-in debugging tool for watching the Web pages unfold. I used it to figure out what was working and not working in the different browsers. This should help IE9 recover some of its momentum. I, like many developers, started shifting to Firefox when the Firebug plug-in made it that much easier to start a project by creating pages for Firefox and then testing them on IE9.
HTML5 compatibility, security, and speedIt's also important to look at Microsoft's claims of HTML5 compatibility carefully. The HTML5Test.com site, for instance, gives IE9 a score of 96 out of 300, a big boost from previous versions of IE, which barely scored any points at all. IE9 scores well on the multimedia features like the video and audio tags, but gets scores of zero on less spectacular features like microdata. Are these features important to you?
Microsoft is also promising to do a better job on security and the provenance of data, recognizing that it's becoming increasingly difficult for anyone to trust some of the information coming over the wire. Between the phishers, the malware, and the outright fraudulent sites, browsing is a dangerous game. I tried testing IE9's filters with several sites that were reported as evil by Google, and I couldn't find any that would set off Microsoft's alarm. Some like gumblar.cn are long gone and Microsoft knows it. But others like spykeeworld.com continue to raise flags with Chrome but not with IE9. This service may take some time to gel. IE9's database may not be as comprehensive as Google's, and it may not get to where it needs to be without actively crawling the web.
If Microsoft's vision for the future catches on and Web designers start creating sites that need all of the processing power of a GPU, the gamers won't be the only ones spending more on the video card than they do on the rest of the machine. Heck, even the physicists deep in their underground caverns will be buying video cards that were once marketed only to gamers.
This story, "First look: Internet Explorer 9 beta makes waves," was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Follow the latest news in software development, languages and standards, HTML, and applications at InfoWorld.com.
Read more about applications in InfoWorld's Applications Channel.
This story, "First look: Internet Explorer 9 beta makes waves" was originally published by InfoWorld.