You might not know BroadSoft if you're not in the telecommunications space. But if you use a hosted unified communications service from a provider like Verizon, Swisscom, or any of about 500 other telcos around the world, you may be a BroadSoft customer without realizing it.
That's because BroadSoft made a strategic bet not to sell directly enterprises. Rather, it assembles the pieces necessary for telcos to host and sell unified communications (UC) services -- think voice, messaging, video conferencing, and so on.
Michael Tessler cofounded BroadSoft in 1998 after coming from Alcatel, and has since grown it into a publicly traded company with annual revenue of more than $160 million. In a recent interview with IDG Enterprise Chief Content Officer John Gallant, Tessler explained how Broadsoft sees the hosted communications landscape and the role of mobile devices.
Here are some of the highlights:
- Abstracting complexity is the key to success: "One of the most important things that we focus on is really making sure that the end users can actually effectively use all those capabilities .... The very massive amount of interoperability to all the devices that make up the solution, so handsets and gateways and all the things that need to be done, but the end user really doesnt want to know how complicated that is. Weve done a tremendous amount of work in making sure all that is really simple, integrated, easy to use, so that the operators can deliver much more effectively."
- Why the rise of mobile gives operators an edge in selling UC: "As mobile operators launch hosted unified communications solutions and all that unified communications capability now exists in their mobile core, now theyll be able to go to enterprises and basically present a fully integrated solution. What does that mean? Every employee gets a single subscription and then you, as an enterprise, can choose -- does that employee need a hard phone? Do they need a mobile? Do they need a soft line? Do they need two hard phones? Do they need a hard phone at their house and their remote office? All of that now changes to really treating this thing as one, one single subscription .... This is where our integration and strategic alignment with mobile operators is critical for delivering on the next-generation mobile enterprise solution. We really feel great about the strategic choice weve made. I think selling directly to enterprises would be a distraction."
- Watch out for "open" solutions that aren't really open: "I think competitively you have lots of vendor lock-in, which ultimately goes against the whole concept of moving unified communications into the cloud. As an enterprise you want to be able to use the max devices. You want to be able to pick phones. You want to be able to pick clients. You want to be able to integrate with your technologies. You maybe will want to substitute out a particular element of the UC stack for something you think is better or fits better in your environment. You want to be able to have that flexibility in these solutions. Unfortunately, the unified communications field talks a lot about openness and interoperability, but everybody seems to be selling closed solutions with very little openness."
The full interview follows:
John Gallant: What is the BroadSoft mission and how do you deliver on that mission?
Michael Tessler: At BroadSoft, we are delivering unified communications solutions to service providers around the world and enabling them to deliver unified communications as a service, really a new category of capability. Instead of enterprises looking to purchase software and servers and do all that integration on their own, were enabling the service providers to come to market with a full unified communications solution that enterprises can consume on a per month, per seat basis -- very much like the transformation that took place with CRM and companies like salesforce.com. We allow the service providers to brand, using their own branding. We become a kind of BroadSoft Inside, inside the carriers networks, and allow them to build their own brand with these unified communications solutions. Thats one of the reasons why enterprise customers may not know us as a brand name, but would see us as powering services that they might purchase from their operators, whether those are fixed operators, mobile operators around the world.
Today we power a little over 500 operators around the world, and of those operators we power about 20 of the top 25 by revenue size. Were certainly well penetrated in the service provider marketplace globally.
Q: There isnt always a consistent definition of what unified communications is. In your view, what are the key components of that? What do you have to deliver to make a great UC solution?
A: The functional elements would be things like the old, what we call PBX functions, unified messaging, audio conferencing capability, desktop sharing collaboration, instant messaging and call centers or group capabilities, the front-office capabilities, the ability to interact on lots of devices mobile and fixed devices. Those are the functional elements that make up what we would consider the unified communications suite.
One of the most important things that we focus on is really making sure that the end users can actually effectively use all those capabilities, so a huge focus on user experience, with that user experience crossing over from handsets to desktops, whether its Windows or Mac, to tablets to mobile phones, all the various operating systems, and really being able to make sure that all those experiences allow the end user to take advantage of this unified communications capability. What does that mean? It allows me to be more productive internally, allows me to be more effective in getting a group of employees together to collaborate. We can start dialoguing on instant messaging at present, and promote through conference and video. We can share documents. The way I love to think about unified communications is really using all these tools to be making sure that the employees will end up being more productive, both internally and also externally, with partners, customers. Thats really the drive for this.
Q: So how quickly is this hosted UC market taking shape?
A: The big shift has been building for quite some time. I think the big shift that has taken place recently is that a lot of the operators have been delivering what I would call hosted PBX functions, very much voice-centric capabilities...
Q: The managed Centrex kind of thing?
A: Exactly. Centrex was not a loved term, but definitely in the hosted voice world, a much richer experience, passing lots of the control over to the end users, but very much centered around replacing the PBX into the cloud. I think whats shifted in the last 18 months is really taking that core and adding on the rest of the productivity capabilities that I mentioned before and transforming what I would call hosted voice or hosted PBX to now its hosted unified communications capabilities. Its not a U.S.-only phenomenon or a particular market. Were seeing this happen in every market that we participate in around the world. One of the things driving that is that unified communications is a very complex service to build. Lots of services, lots of functional elements, lots of complexity. The operator can reduce that complexity for the enterprise, so they can get this rich unified communications suite without all the complexity and with interoperability and upgrades. They can really take advantage of the productivity gains without all that major investment in both capex and ongoing operating expense.
Q: One of the things that service providers are criticized for is that they havent moved very quickly into the cloud services market. At least in the customers minds, they dont have a great track record. What is it about the product set that you deliver that would make the enterprise user comfortable with this hosted UC?
A: Many times the challenge the operators have is that theyre delivered a set of components of technology and theyre required to integrate and create the end service. Weve brought everything together for the operator from user experiences, and what I mean by that is clients that run on all the various devices that are delivered out of the network, upgrade out of the network, to the core functions, to the bridging functions, audio conferencing functions. The very massive amount of interoperability to all the devices that make up the solution, so handsets and gateways and all the things that need to be done, but the end user really doesnt want to know how complicated that is. Weve done a tremendous amount of work in making sure all that is really simple, integrated, easy to use, so that the operators can deliver much more effectively. Weve also focused for the operators on how to deliver the value proposition. Weve done lots of work in terms of helping them do a better job of understanding the customers requirements, and how to match that to the capabilities in the suite.
Another area that weve spent quite a bit of time on is how to really help those operators with things around delivery. Youre going to deliver a unified communications solution in the cloud. How do you make sure that service runs effectively? You can troubleshoot it, you can monitor 7/24. You can really provide superior performance on the service. We have all that in our suite. We deliver that to the operator, so the enterprise customer gets a much stronger capability through the operators than, I think, where traditionally the operators are forced to bring lots of components from multiple vendors together. We really helped them with the messaging, the packaging, the sales promotion, the way to go to market, really to help them figure out a segment into the various enterprise markets. Also, on the back side we really helped them with the delivery side of it, which can get complex as its a big shift of moving from traditional premise delivery to cloud where the operators have scale and will shine in terms of running very highly scalable, reliable, redundant infrastructures.
Q: Companies like Cisco and Avaya are trying to outfit service providers or channel partners to offer hosted collaboration services as well. Talk about the competitive landscape. Who are the big competitors and how does your approach differ strategically from what they do?
A: Most of the competition is the operator-branded service competing with an enterprise solution from one of the enterprise PBX providers. Thats most of the competition that we see today. Many years ago we chose strategically to align and build our business around making a big bet on operators as the channel. We dont sell direct to enterprise. Our technology is built for operators, designed around operator infrastructure, designed around operator deployment models. Enabling the operators to create their own branded services is a huge differentiator. In addition to that, allowing them to make a much more healthy return on their investment in our technology, versus others that see the operators more as channels or resellers and are really looking to push their brand through those operators. Those are the strategic set of differentiators.
Then theres a technology differentiator where weve been built from the ground up to being multi-tenanted in the operator network, able to interwork with both existing mobile infrastructures, 3G, 2G infrastructures and also next-generation IMS infrastructure. These are all the things that operators understand and care about. All of the what I would call enterprise communications companies dont really understand that operator environment, dont come from that environment, and havent made a strategic bet that the operators are going to win a significant portion of this unified communications marketplace.
Q: Would you ever sell directly to enterprise? We have more and more of the readers that are trying to build private cloud kind of environments at scale. I know they can never replicate the scale or the capability that a service provider has, but they certainly are in the market to try to do things in a much more efficient and unified way. Is that a market youd ever target?
A: Not really. Strategically weve decided to focus on service providers. We dont have an enterprise brand. We have a very well known operator brand and service provider brand. Its not really a strategic direction wed like to follow. One of the things that were very excited about is that we think this enterprise communications world is moving not only from enterprise to cloud, but from cloud to mobile cloud. This is where our integration and strategic alignment with mobile operators is critical for delivering on the next-generation mobile enterprise solution. We really feel great about the strategic choice weve made. I think selling directly to enterprises would be a distraction.
Q: Youve mentioned mobile a number of times, and thats obviously a huge issue for our readers. I think theyre getting through the first stage of dealing with mobile in the sense of coming up with the right policies or approaches to BYOD. But in your world, how do you see enterprises really capitalizing on it? What does this hosted UC allow them to do to really take better advantage of mobility?