Hands on: AT&T's Samsung Galaxy S II

By JR Raphael (@jr_raphael)

Talk about good timing: I just finished spending a week with Sprint's Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch, and what arrives on my doorstep? Why, it's AT&T's version of the very same phone.

Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T

At a glance, AT&T's Samsung Galaxy S II looks pretty similar to Sprint's edition. The most noticeable difference is its size: AT&T stuck with the 4.3-inch screen used in Samsung's international GSII model, while Sprint expanded to a 4.5-inch display. AT&T's phone has a smaller overall profile as a result.

Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T - Sprint

The body designs are slightly different, too, with AT&T's device being a bit more squared off than Sprint's. You can see the contrast along the edges, where AT&T's Galaxy S II is less rounded, and also on the back of the phone, where AT&T's rear panel is shorter and flatter than Sprint's rendition. Even the area around the camera is squared off on AT&T's phone and rounded on Sprint's.

Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T - Sprint, Back

That aside, the two devices' specs are about the same. The software is roughly comparable, too, though AT&T has added on its own set of Android bloatware. The carrier has also configured the home screens somewhat differently by default, though that can obviously be changed.

Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T - Sprint, Home Screens


AT&T's Galaxy S II officially launches next Sunday, October 2. I'll be spending some time getting to know the device over the next several days; check back next week for more detailed thoughts about its performance and how it compares to Sprint's Galaxy S II model.

UPDATE: AT&T's Samsung Galaxy S II: The verdict is in 

And if you haven't yet had a chance to check out my in-depth review of Sprint's Galaxy S II phone, you can find it here:

One week with Samsung's Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch

JR Raphael writes about smartphones and other tasty technology. You can find him on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+.

Article copyright 2011 JR Raphael. All rights reserved.

Why is Apple letting Macs rot on the tree?
View Comments
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies